Consultation

CurrencyCurrent through May 31, 2023
Citation 40 C.F.R. §93.105
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Sierra Club v. Atlanta Regional Com'n, CIV.A.1:01-CV0428BBM.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Northern District of Georgia
    • June 15, 2001
    ...or allow public comment on the use of the 2005 analysis year to show conformity. Second, the plaintiffs state that the USDOT violated 40 C.F.R. § 93.105(e),23 and 23 C.F.R. § 450.316(b)(1) by approving the conformity determination made by ARC using the 2005 emissions analysis year with no p......
  • Sierra Club v. Atlanta Regional Com'n, CIV.A. 101CV0428BBM.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Northern District of Georgia
    • January 18, 2002
    ...comment on the use of the 2005 analysis year to show conformity. Second, the Page 1343 plaintiffs state that the USDOT violated 40 C.F.R. § 93.105(e) and 23 C.F.R. § 450.316(b)(1)20 by approving the conformity determination made by ARC using the 2005 emissions analysis year with inadequate ......
  • Audubon Naturalist Soc. v. U.S. Dept. of Transp., Civil Action No. AW-06-3386.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • November 8, 2007
    ...provide "reasonable public access to Page 705 technical and policy information ... at the beginning of the public comment period." 40 C.F.R. § 93.105(e). The record indicates that the Conformity Determination was released for public comment on March 24, 2006. See FHWA 183022. This publicly ......
  • City of South Pasadena v. Slater, CV98-6996DDP(MANx).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Central District of California
    • July 19, 1999
    ...and EPA, including consultation on the issues described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, before making conformity determinations. 40 C.F.R. § 93.105(a)(2). The regulations state that "Interagency consultation procedures shall include at a minimum ... A process for circulating (or provid......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The State Implementation Plan Process
    • United States
    • Air pollution control and climate change mitigation law
    • August 18, 2010
    ...EPA amended its conformity rule to comply with the D.C. Circuit’s opinions and the statutory change. 322 Each state is required by 40 C.F.R. §93.105 to revise its SIP. Most states have had their general conformity SIP revisions approved, but states that do not have an approved transportatio......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT