24 CFR 200.926d - Construction requirements

Cite as24 CFR 200.926d
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
19 practice notes
  • Whatcom Cnty., Corp. v. Hirst, No. 91475–3
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Washington
    • October 6, 2016
    ...Development mortgage insurance relying on individual water systems, “[t]he system should be capable of delivering a flow of 5 gpm.” 24 C.F.R. § 200.926d(f)(2)(i). The withdrawals at issue in Postema were 280 gpm, 142 Wash.2d at 101, 11 P.3d 726 ; 200 gpm, id. at 103, 11 P.3d 726 ; 3,500 gpm......
  • Notice of Regulatory Waiver Requests Granted for the Second Quarter of Calendar Year 2014
    • United States
    • Federal Register September 03, 2014
    • September 3, 2014
    ...of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW., Room 6134, Washington, DC 20410, telephone (202) 402-8386. Regulation: 24 CFR 200.926d(b)(4)(i). Project/Activity: Whiting Avenue Estates, Stevens Point, Wisconsin Project Number: Nature of Requirement: HUD's regulation at 24 CFR 200......
  • Regulatory waiver requests; quarterly listing,
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 22, 2006
    • December 22, 2006
    ...waivers, please see the name of the contact person that immediately follows the description of the waiver granted. Regulation: 24 CFR 200.926d(f)(1)(i) and Project/Activity: This waiver was granted to permit insurance of mortgages secured by new single family construction that rely upon hau......
  • Regulatory Waiver Requests Granted (Second Quarter of Calendar Year 2009)
    • United States
    • Federal Register September 16, 2009
    • September 16, 2009
    ...requirements for manufactured housing and align them with that of stick built homes as provided in the Minimum Property Standards at 24 CFR 200.926d (c)(4)(i). Specifically, upon the publication of this proposed rule as a final rule, a manufactured home that is within a FEMA designated SFHA......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 cases
  • Whatcom Cnty., Corp. v. Hirst, No. 91475–3
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Washington
    • October 6, 2016
    ...Development mortgage insurance relying on individual water systems, “[t]he system should be capable of delivering a flow of 5 gpm.” 24 C.F.R. § 200.926d(f)(2)(i). The withdrawals at issue in Postema were 280 gpm, 142 Wash.2d at 101, 11 P.3d 726 ; 200 gpm, id. at 103, 11 P.3d 726 ; 3,500 gpm......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT