15 CFR 930.121 - Consistent with the objectives or purposes of the Act

Cite as15 CFR 930.121
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
55 practice notes
  • Ocean and coastal resource management: Coastal Zone Management Act; Federal consistency process,
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 05, 2006
    • January 5, 2006
    ...the Secretary needs only sufficient time and information to make a rational and well-reasoned determination of each of the elements in 15 CFR 930.121 or NOAA has retained the requirement from the proposed rule that the appellant's brief is due within 30 days of the filing of the notice of a......
  • Part III
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 05, 2006
    • January 5, 2006
    ...the Secretary needs only sufficient time and information to make a rational and well-reasoned determination of each of the elements in 15 CFR 930.121 or NOAA has retained the requirement from the proposed rule that the appellant's brief is due within 30 days of the filing of the notice of a......
  • Stoeco Development, Ltd., Matter of
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division
    • February 8, 1993
    ...not review the state's finding of inconsistency, but instead focuses upon whether the project furthers paramount federal policies. 15 C.F.R. § 930.121. Appellants Stoeco Development, Ltd. and Stainton-Burrell Development, Ltd. (Stoeco) submitted an application for a Section 404 permit to th......
  • Ocean and coastal resource management: Coastal Zone Management Act; Federal consistency process,
    • United States
    • Federal Register June 11, 2003
    • June 11, 2003
    ...needs only sufficient time and information required to make a rational and well-reasoned determination of each of the elements in 15 CFR 930.121 or The proposed change to Sec. 930.127(d) would move language from Sec. 930.130(d) regarding the appellant's burden to support its appeal, and mak......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
  • Stoeco Development, Ltd., Matter of
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division
    • February 8, 1993
    ...not review the state's finding of inconsistency, but instead focuses upon whether the project furthers paramount federal policies. 15 C.F.R. § 930.121. Appellants Stoeco Development, Ltd. and Stainton-Burrell Development, Ltd. (Stoeco) submitted an application for a Section 404 permit to th......
  • North Carolina v. Raimondo, 2:20-CV-59-FL
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Eastern District of North Carolina
    • September 20, 2021
    ...the national interest as articulated in § 302 or § 303 of the [Coastal Zone Management] Act, in a significant or substantial manner.” 15 C.F.R. § 930.121. If a federal permit applicant is required to submit a consistency certification, the federal permitting agency may not issue the permit ......
  • Exxon Corp. v. Fischer, No. 85-6572
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • January 7, 1987
    ...the Secretary dismissed Exxon's appeal. The Secretary found, pursuant to the four-part test established in the applicable regulation, 15 C.F.R. Sec. 930.121 (1986), that well B was not consistent with the CZMA's purposes. Although it would further the national goal of energy self-sufficienc......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT