42 CFR 405.948 - Conduct of a redetermination

Cite as42 CFR 405.948
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 practice notes
  • Almy v. Sebelius, Civil Action No. RDB–08–1245.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • 3 Septiembre 2010
    ...405.940–405.958; 42 U.S.C. § 1395ff(a)(3). The DMAC's redetermination process is non-adversarial, and its decision is nonprecedential. 42 C.F.R. § 405.948. A party receiving a “redetermination” may seek further review by applying for a “reconsideration” by a qualified independent contractor......
  • I & R Med., P.C. v. Cochran, 17-CV-6417 (ILG)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • 18 Febrero 2021
    ...individual [employed by the Contractor] who was not involved in making the initial determination must make a redetermination." 42 C.F.R. § 405.948.Following redetermination, a dissatisfied party may then request reconsideration by a QIC within 180 days, regardless of the amount in cont......
  • Strand Analytical Labs., LLC v. Burwell, No. 1:13-cv-00645-LJM-DKL
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court (Southern District of Indiana)
    • 30 Julio 2015
    ...42 C.F.R. § 405.940. The redetermination is performed by a different individual than the one who performed the initial review. 42 C.F.R. § 405.948. If the redetermination is unsatisfactory to the supplier, it may seek reconsideration by a qualified independent contractor ("QIC"). ......
  • Art of Healing Med., P.C. v. Burwell, No. 14–CV–4001.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • 10 Marzo 2015
    ...involves an independent review of the claim by a MAC employee who was not involved in making the initial determination. 42 C.F.R. § 405.948.Redetermination requests may be dismissed on various procedural grounds, including lack of a valid request, failure to file within the proper filing ti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
  • Almy v. Sebelius, Civil Action No. RDB–08–1245.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • 3 Septiembre 2010
    ...405.940–405.958; 42 U.S.C. § 1395ff(a)(3). The DMAC's redetermination process is non-adversarial, and its decision is nonprecedential. 42 C.F.R. § 405.948. A party receiving a “redetermination” may seek further review by applying for a “reconsideration” by a qualified independent contractor......
  • I & R Med., P.C. v. Cochran, 17-CV-6417 (ILG)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • 18 Febrero 2021
    ..."An individual [employed by the Contractor] who was not involved in making the initial determination must make a redetermination." 42 C.F.R. § 405.948.Following redetermination, a dissatisfied party may then request reconsideration by a QIC within 180 days, regardless of the amount in contr......
  • Strand Analytical Labs., LLC v. Burwell, No. 1:13-cv-00645-LJM-DKL
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court (Southern District of Indiana)
    • 30 Julio 2015
    ...42 C.F.R. § 405.940. The redetermination is performed by a different individual than the one who performed the initial review. 42 C.F.R. § 405.948. If the redetermination is unsatisfactory to the supplier, it may seek reconsideration by a qualified independent contractor ("QIC"). 42 U.S.C. ......
  • Art of Healing Med., P.C. v. Burwell, No. 14–CV–4001.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • 10 Marzo 2015
    ...involves an independent review of the claim by a MAC employee who was not involved in making the initial determination. 42 C.F.R. § 405.948.Redetermination requests may be dismissed on various procedural grounds, including lack of a valid request, failure to file within the proper filing ti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT