18 C.F.R. §385.206 - Complaints (Rule 206)
| Cite as | 18 C.F.R. §385.206 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
53 cases
-
Mobil Oil Exploration Producing Southeast Inc v. United Distribution Companies Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. United Distribution Companies
...abandonment on the grounds that the conditions the agency has set forth have not been met may file a complaint with the Commission. See 18 CFR § 385.206 We turn, finally, to the problem of "take-or-pay" contracts. A take-or-pay contract obligates a pipeline to purchase a specified volume of......
-
United Distribution Companies v. F.E.R.C., s. 92-1485
...for LDCs serving core customers. Order No. 636-A, p 30,950, at 30,633. Although the petitioners object that the complaint process, 18 C.F.R. § 385.206, provides inadequate protection, it is evident that the Commission intended the complaint process to serve only as a back-up to the right-of......
-
Cent. Hudson Gas & Elec. Corp. v. N.Y. Indep. Sys. Operator
...Electric & Gas Corporation; Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.; and Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation. [3] 16 U.S.C. § 824e; 18 C.F.R. § 385.206 (2021). [4] System Upgrade Facilities are defined in Attachment S of NYISO's OATT as "[t]he least costly configuration of commercially avail......
-
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC v. NTE Carolinas II, LLC
...to file a complaint against Duke if it believed that Duke's contract with FPWC violated a FERC statute, rule, order, or other law. See 18 C.F.R. § 385.206. Second, NTE could have intervened in Duke's request to file the rate, see 18 C.F.R. § 385.214, and, third, NTE could have protested the......
Request a trial to view additional results