18 C.F.R. §385.206 - Complaints (Rule 206)

Cite as18 C.F.R. §385.206
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
53 cases
  • Mobil Oil Exploration Producing Southeast Inc v. United Distribution Companies Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. United Distribution Companies
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • January 8, 1991
    ...abandonment on the grounds that the conditions the agency has set forth have not been met may file a complaint with the Commission. See 18 CFR § 385.206 We turn, finally, to the problem of "take-or-pay" contracts. A take-or-pay contract obligates a pipeline to purchase a specified volume of......
  • United Distribution Companies v. F.E.R.C., s. 92-1485
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • October 29, 1996
    ...for LDCs serving core customers. Order No. 636-A, p 30,950, at 30,633. Although the petitioners object that the complaint process, 18 C.F.R. § 385.206, provides inadequate protection, it is evident that the Commission intended the complaint process to serve only as a back-up to the right-of......
  • Cent. Hudson Gas & Elec. Corp. v. N.Y. Indep. Sys. Operator
    • United States
    • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    • March 24, 2022
    ...Electric & Gas Corporation; Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.; and Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation. [3] 16 U.S.C. § 824e; 18 C.F.R. § 385.206 (2021). [4] System Upgrade Facilities are defined in Attachment S of NYISO's OATT as "[t]he least costly configuration of commercially avail......
  • Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC v. NTE Carolinas II, LLC
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Western District of North Carolina
    • June 24, 2022
    ...to file a complaint against Duke if it believed that Duke's contract with FPWC violated a FERC statute, rule, order, or other law. See 18 C.F.R. § 385.206. Second, NTE could have intervened in Duke's request to file the rate, see 18 C.F.R. § 385.214, and, third, NTE could have protested the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT