29 C.F.R. §1614.103 - Complaints of discrimination covered by this part
| Cite as | 29 C.F.R. §1614.103 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
195 cases
-
Fitzgerald v. Henderson, 98-CV-1005.
...federal agencies such as the Postal Service to adopt procedures for processing discrimination complaints by their employees. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.103(b)(3), 1614.104-.106 (1998); see generally, 29 C.F.R. § 1614 et seq. (Federal Sector Equal Employment Opportunity Regulations). These proced......
-
Bennett v. Henderson, Civil Action No. 97-2151-GLR.
...501 of the Act. It covers individual and class complaints of discrimination and retaliation prohibited by the Rehabilitation Act. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.103(a). It expressly applies to the United States Postal Service. Id. § 1614.103(b)(3). Effective October 1, 1992, Part 1614 superceded Part 161......
-
Wade v. Donahoe, CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-3795
...room. Therefore, she does not state a claim under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Wade cites 5 C.F.R. §§ 353.301(d) and 353(d)36 and 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.103(a)(b)(3) and 1614.203. Wade argues that these regulations support her assertion that the USPSPage 29discriminated against her based on her......
-
Nishibayashi v. England, CIV.04-00248 ACK/LEK.
...States. See Pub.L. No. 102-166, 105 Stat. 1071, § 109(c) (November 21, 1991). Plaintiff also bases her jurisdictional argument on 29 C.F.R § 1614.103 (current through January 5, 2005) which implements the provisions of Title VII. However, like the statute itself, the regulation expressly st......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Dual Status National Guard Technicians Should be Barred From Bringing Civil Suits Under Title VII
...(LexisNexis 2008). 94 Notice of Proposed Amendment, National Guard Technician Act, 32 U.S.C. § 709 (2000) (on file with author). 95 29 C.F.R. § 1614.103(d)(1) (2008) (excluding uniformed members of the military departments from Title VII's 96 See Fisher v. Peters, 249 F.3d 433, 443-44 (6th ......