45 CFR 1618.3 - Complaints
| Cite as | 45 CFR 1618.3 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Regional Management v. Legal Serv. Corp., No. 98-2165
...to do business in that State. In February 1996, Regional filed a complaint with Legal Services pursuant to the complaint procedure of 45 C.F.R. § 1618.3, claiming that both the South Carolina and the Georgia lobbying violated the LSC Act and the then-applicable regulations. Soon thereafter,......
-
Harris v. Tower Loan of Mississippi, Inc., No. 77-3280
...proper recourse would be to complain to Legal Services, the State Advisory Council, or the Corporation; not resistance to a fee award. 45 C.F.R. 1618.3. This procedure is designed to prevent a question of whether the Act has been violated from becoming an ancillary issue in any case underta......
-
Peretz v. Legal Aid Foundation of L. A., No. BV 024997.
...was a failure to comply with the regulations, the proper recourse would be to complain to [the LSC]; not resistance to a fee award. 45 C.F.R. 1618.3."; Grassley v. Legal Services Corp., supra, 535 F.Supp. at p. 818 [no private right of action]; Ex parte Mitchell (Ala.1981) 395 So.2d 51......
-
Ex parte Mitchell, PONTIAC-BUICK-GM
...procedures under the Legal Services Corporation Act) establishes a systematic procedure for enforcing compliance with the Act, and 45 C.F.R. § 1618.3, which A complaint of a violation of the Act by a recipient or an employee may be made to the recipient, the State Advisory Council, or the C......
4 cases
-
Regional Management v. Legal Serv. Corp., No. 98-2165
...to do business in that State. In February 1996, Regional filed a complaint with Legal Services pursuant to the complaint procedure of 45 C.F.R. § 1618.3, claiming that both the South Carolina and the Georgia lobbying violated the LSC Act and the then-applicable regulations. Soon thereafter,......
-
Harris v. Tower Loan of Mississippi, Inc., No. 77-3280
...proper recourse would be to complain to Legal Services, the State Advisory Council, or the Corporation; not resistance to a fee award. 45 C.F.R. 1618.3. This procedure is designed to prevent a question of whether the Act has been violated from becoming an ancillary issue in any case underta......
-
Peretz v. Legal Aid Foundation of L. A., No. BV 024997.
...was a failure to comply with the regulations, the proper recourse would be to complain to [the LSC]; not resistance to a fee award. 45 C.F.R. 1618.3."; Grassley v. Legal Services Corp., supra, 535 F.Supp. at p. 818 [no private right of action]; Ex parte Mitchell (Ala.1981) 395 So.2d 51......
-
Ex parte Mitchell, PONTIAC-BUICK-GM
...procedures under the Legal Services Corporation Act) establishes a systematic procedure for enforcing compliance with the Act, and 45 C.F.R. § 1618.3, which A complaint of a violation of the Act by a recipient or an employee may be made to the recipient, the State Advisory Council, or the C......