2 C.F.R. §200.319 - Competition
| Cite as | 2 C.F.R. §200.319 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
A.L. Prime Energy Consultant, Inc. v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., SJC–12370
...for convenience clause, but leaves State and municipal recipients of Federal funds free to craft their own contractual language. See 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Appendix II(B); FTA Circular, supra at 13. Compare 48 C.F.R. §§ 52.249–1 to 52.249–7 (requiring specific language for termination for conve......
-
Brooks v. Barrett, CASE NO. 2:18-cv-565-GMB [wo]
...brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and a claim for violation of 2 C.F.R. § 200.319. The court begins with the due process claim and then will turn to the regulatory claim. a. Claim for Violation of Due Process Barrett and......
-
Holy Cross Sch. v. Fed. Emergency Mgmt. Agency F EMA, 2:21-CV-01658
...of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition[.]” 2 C.F.R. § 200.319. However, under exigent or emergency circumstances, grantees may be permitted to bypass the competitive solicitation requirement and issue noncompe......