2 C.F.R. §200.319 - Competition

Cite as2 C.F.R. §200.319
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • A.L. Prime Energy Consultant, Inc. v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., SJC–12370
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • May 2, 2018
    ...for convenience clause, but leaves State and municipal recipients of Federal funds free to craft their own contractual language. See 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Appendix II(B); FTA Circular, supra at 13. Compare 48 C.F.R. §§ 52.249–1 to 52.249–7 (requiring specific language for termination for conve......
  • Brooks v. Barrett, CASE NO. 2:18-cv-565-GMB [wo]
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Middle District of Alabama
    • November 15, 2018
    ...brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and a claim for violation of 2 C.F.R. § 200.319. The court begins with the due process claim and then will turn to the regulatory claim. a. Claim for Violation of Due Process Barrett and......
  • Holy Cross Sch. v. Fed. Emergency Mgmt. Agency F EMA, 2:21-CV-01658
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Louisiana)
    • January 3, 2023
    ...of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition[.]” 2 C.F.R. § 200.319. However, under exigent or emergency circumstances, grantees may be permitted to bypass the competitive solicitation requirement and issue noncompe......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT