49 C.F.R. 1105.6 - Classification of actions
| Cite as | 49 C.F.R. 1105.6 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
391 practice notes
-
Solid Waste Rail Transfer Facilities
...must be decided by the Director of OEA. 49 CFR 1155.24(a) (``OEA may reclassify the environmental review requirements * * *, pursuant to 49 CFR 1105.6(d).''); 49 CFR 1105.2 (``The Director of OEA * * * is delegated the authority * * * to render initial decisions on requests for waiver or mo......
-
Railroad consolidations, mergers, and acquisitions of control: Safety integration plans,
...of the transaction involves operational changes that exceed the regulatory thresholds established under 49 CFR 1105.7(e)(4) or (5). See 49 CFR 1105.6(b)(4)(i). In the event that a SIP should be required in a transaction that would not be subject to environmental review, see 49 CFR 1105.6(c)......
-
Railroad consolidations, mergers, and acquisitions of control: Safety integration plans,
...of the transaction involves operational changes that exceed the regulatory thresholds established under 49 CFR 1105.7(e)(4) or (5). See 49 CFR 1105.6(b)(4)(i). In the event that a SIP should be required in a transaction that would not be subject to environmental review, the Board intends to......
-
National Environmental Policy Act; implementation,
...types of activities that have been categorically excluded by the Surface Transportation Board (STB). The STB's environmental procedures (49 CFR 1105.6(c)(2)) categorically exclude from the need to prepare either an EIS or an EA any action that does not result in significant changes in rail ......
Request a trial to view additional results
20 cases
-
Jefferson St. Ventures, LLC v. City of Indio, G049899
...had to meet requirements of both the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA, 236 Cal.App.4th 118442 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq. ; 49 C.F.R. §§ 1105.6, 1105.7 ), and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Pub. Resources Code, § 21000, et seq. ; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 23, § 3775, e......
-
City of Yakima v. Surface Transp. Bd., No. CY-98-30331-AAM.
...Company. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 ("NEPA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-4371d, and the STB's own rules, 49 C.F.R. Part 1105, the STB conducted an environmental review of BNSF's proposed operation of the Stampede Pass line. See Auburn v. U.S. Government, 154 F.3......
-
River v. N. Coast R.R. Auth., A139222
...an environmental review under federal law, including the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). (42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq. ; 49 C.F.R. §§ 1105.6, 1105.7 ; see Missouri Min., Inc. v. I.C.C. (8th Cir.1994) 33 F.3d 980, 983(Missouri Min. ).) The STB may exempt an applicant from norma......
-
STARKE COUNTY FARM BUREAU CO-OP. v. ICC, Civ. No. 1:93cv233.
...the proposed abandonment and will issue an environmental assessment, which will then be released for public review and comment. See 49 C.F.R. §§ 1105.6(a), After considering public comments and the recommendations of its environmental staff, the ICC will determine whether it needs to prepar......
Request a trial to view additional results