20 CFR 702.441 - Claims for loss of hearing
| Cite as | 20 CFR 702.441 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
48 practice notes
-
Jones v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc., BRB 16-0690
...the test is administered; and 3) there are no contrary audiogram results from the same time period. 33 U.S.C. §908(c)(13)(C); see also 20 C.F.R. §702.441. Beyond the amount of disability compensation owed to an employee under Section 8, such a diagnosis impacts the remainder of a claimant's......
-
Pierce v. Electric Boat Corp., BRB 18-0609
...see Pimpinella v. Universal Mar. Serv., Inc., 27 BRBS 154, 159 n.4 (1993) (AMA Guides not required for other claims); see also 20 C.F.R. §702.441(d) (evaluation of hearing impairment). In doing so, it acknowledged the AMA Guides would be used in determining permanent impairment, and the AMA......
-
Pierce v. Electric Boat Corp., BRB 18-0609
...see Pimpinella v. Universal Mar. Serv., Inc., 27 BRBS 154, 159 n.4 (1993) (AMA Guides not required for other claims); see also 20 C.F.R. §702.441(d) (evaluation of hearing impairment). In doing so, it acknowledged the AMA Guides would be used in determining permanent impairment, and the AMA......
-
Bridier v. Alabama Dry Dock & Shipbuilding Corp., BRB 92-2358
...the American Medical Association, Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (3d ed. 1988) (AMA Guides), and the regulation at 20 C.F.R. §702.441. He determined that the stringent criteria of 20 C.F.R. §702.441 are applicable to quantifying the degree of hearing loss and not to whethe......
Request a trial to view additional results
53 cases
-
Pierce v. Electric Boat Corp.
...see Pimpinella v. Universal Mar. Serv., Inc., 27 BRBS 154, 159 n.4 (1993) (AMA Guides not required for other claims); see also 20 C.F.R. §702.441(d) (evaluation of hearing impairment). In doing so, it acknowledged the AMA Guides would be used in determining permanent impairment, and the AMA......
-
Jones v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc.
...the test is administered; and 3) there are no contrary audiogram results from the same time period. 33 U.S.C. §908(c)(13)(C); see also 20 C.F.R. §702.441. Beyond the amount of disability compensation owed to an employee under Section 8, such a diagnosis impacts the remainder of a claimant's......
-
Pierce v. Electric Boat Corp., BRB 18-0609
...see Pimpinella v. Universal Mar. Serv., Inc., 27 BRBS 154, 159 n.4 (1993) (AMA Guides not required for other claims); see also 20 C.F.R. §702.441(d) (evaluation of hearing impairment). In doing so, it acknowledged the AMA Guides would be used in determining permanent impairment, and the AMA......
-
Jones v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc., BRB 16-0690
...the test is administered; and 3) there are no contrary audiogram results from the same time period. 33 U.S.C. §908(c)(13)(C); see also 20 C.F.R. §702.441. Beyond the amount of disability compensation owed to an employee under Section 8, such a diagnosis impacts the remainder of a claimant's......
Request a trial to view additional results