36 CFR 222.4 - Changes in grazing permits

Cite as36 CFR 222.4
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 practice notes
  • Postdecisional Administrative Review Process for Occupancy or Use of National Forest System Lands and Resources
    • United States
    • Federal Register June 05, 2013
    • June 5, 2013
    ...Department of Agriculture may request mediation of a dispute relating to a decision to suspend or cancel the permit as authorized by 36 CFR 222.4(a)(2)(i), (ii), (iv), and (v) and (a)(3) through (6). Any request for mediation must be included in an appeal of the decision to suspend or cance......
  • Buckingham v. SECRETARY OF US DEPT. OF AGR., No. 09-15893.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • April 29, 2010
    ...a grazing permit if a permittee does not comply with the provisions and requirements of that permit or governing regulations. See 36 C.F.R. § 222.4(a)(4). That authority was spelled out for Buckingham in the very language of the 2005 grazing permit he For years, the Forest Service exercised......
  • Cent. Sierra Envtl. Res. Ctr. v. Stanislaus Nat'l Forest, 1:17-cv-00441-LJO-SAB
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Eastern District of California
    • August 6, 2019
    ...or in part' if the permittee fails to comply with the requirements of his or her permit, or with governing regulations." Id. (quoting 36 C.F.R. § 222.4(a)(4)). The second type of site-specific action is an "allotment management plant" ("AMP"), which is "a document that specifies the program......
  • Hubbard v. Brown, No. S009697
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • February 15, 1990
    ...The rights of the ... permittees in their grazing permits flow from three sources: 16 U.S.C. § 580l; Permit, Part 2, § 8(b); and 36 C.F.R. §§ 222.4(a)(1), (6). None of these sources supports their assertion of a property interest in the permits." (Swim v. Bergland (9th Cir.1983) 696 F.2d 71......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
18 cases
  • Buckingham v. SECRETARY OF US DEPT. OF AGR., No. 09-15893.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • April 29, 2010
    ...a grazing permit if a permittee does not comply with the provisions and requirements of that permit or governing regulations. See 36 C.F.R. § 222.4(a)(4). That authority was spelled out for Buckingham in the very language of the 2005 grazing permit he For years, the Forest Service exercised......
  • Cent. Sierra Envtl. Res. Ctr. v. Stanislaus Nat'l Forest, 1:17-cv-00441-LJO-SAB
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Eastern District of California
    • August 6, 2019
    ...or in part' if the permittee fails to comply with the requirements of his or her permit, or with governing regulations." Id. (quoting 36 C.F.R. § 222.4(a)(4)). The second type of site-specific action is an "allotment management plant" ("AMP"), which is "a document that specifies the program......
  • Hubbard v. Brown, No. S009697
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • February 15, 1990
    ...The rights of the ... permittees in their grazing permits flow from three sources: 16 U.S.C. § 580l; Permit, Part 2, § 8(b); and 36 C.F.R. §§ 222.4(a)(1), (6). None of these sources supports their assertion of a property interest in the permits." (Swim v. Bergland (9th Cir.1983) 696 F.2d 71......
  • Cent. Sierra Envtl. Res. Ctr. v. Stanislaus Nat'l Forest, 1:17–cv–00441–LJO–SAB
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Eastern District of California
    • February 6, 2018
    ...or in part’ if the permittee fails to comply with the requirements of his or her permit, or with governing regulations." Id. (quoting 36 C.F.R. § 222.4(a)(4) ).The second type of site-specific action is an "allotment management plant" ("AMP"), which is "a document that specifies the program......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT