36 C.F.R. §222.4 - Changes in grazing permits
| Cite as | 36 C.F.R. §222.4 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
24 practice notes
-
Postdecisional Administrative Review Process for Occupancy or Use of National Forest System Lands and Resources
...Department of Agriculture may request mediation of a dispute relating to a decision to suspend or cancel the permit as authorized by 36 CFR 222.4(a)(2)(i), (ii), (iv), and (v) and (a)(3) through (6). Any request for mediation must be included in an appeal of the decision to suspend or cance......
-
Cent. Sierra Envtl. Res. Ctr. v. Stanislaus Nat'l Forest, 1:17-cv-00441-LJO-SAB
...or in part' if the permittee fails to comply with the requirements of his or her permit, or with governing regulations." Id. (quoting 36 C.F.R. § 222.4(a)(4)). The second type of site-specific action is an "allotment management plant" ("AMP"), which is "a document that specifies the program......
-
Cent. Sierra Envtl. Res. Ctr. v. Stanislaus Nat'l Forest, 1:17–cv–00441–LJO–SAB
...or in part’ if the permittee fails to comply with the requirements of his or her permit, or with governing regulations." Id. (quoting 36 C.F.R. § 222.4(a)(4) ).The second type of site-specific action is an "allotment management plant" ("AMP"), which is "a document that specifies the program......
-
Hubbard v. Brown, S009697
...The rights of the ... permittees in their grazing permits flow from three sources: 16 U.S.C. § 580l; Permit, Part 2, § 8(b); and 36 C.F.R. §§ 222.4(a)(1), (6). None of these sources supports their assertion of a property interest in the permits." (Swim v. Bergland (9th Cir.1983) 696 F.2d 71......
Request a trial to view additional results
19 cases
-
Cent. Sierra Envtl. Res. Ctr. v. Stanislaus Nat'l Forest, 1:17-cv-00441-LJO-SAB
...or in part' if the permittee fails to comply with the requirements of his or her permit, or with governing regulations." Id. (quoting 36 C.F.R. § 222.4(a)(4)). The second type of site-specific action is an "allotment management plant" ("AMP"), which is "a document that specifies the program......
-
Cent. Sierra Envtl. Res. Ctr. v. Stanislaus Nat'l Forest, 1:17–cv–00441–LJO–SAB
...or in part’ if the permittee fails to comply with the requirements of his or her permit, or with governing regulations." Id. (quoting 36 C.F.R. § 222.4(a)(4) ).The second type of site-specific action is an "allotment management plant" ("AMP"), which is "a document that specifies the program......
-
Hubbard v. Brown, S009697
...The rights of the ... permittees in their grazing permits flow from three sources: 16 U.S.C. § 580l; Permit, Part 2, § 8(b); and 36 C.F.R. §§ 222.4(a)(1), (6). None of these sources supports their assertion of a property interest in the permits." (Swim v. Bergland (9th Cir.1983) 696 F.2d 71......
-
Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. U.S. Forest Service, 05-35637.
...of the AOI and imposed a modification of the underlying grazing permit as the appropriate sanction for the violation. See also 36 C.F.R. § 222.4(a)(4) (authorizing Forest Service to cancel or suspend grazing permit if permittee does not comply with provisions and requirements of permit or g......
Request a trial to view additional results