Categorical exclusions

CurrencyCurrent through May 31, 2023
Citation 36 C.F.R. §220.6
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 cases
  • Friends of Inyo v. U.S. Forest Serv.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 21 Mayo 2024
    ...743, 758, 135 S.Ct. 2699, 192 L.Ed.2d 674 (2015).ANALYSIS The parties dispute whether the Forest Service regulation enumerating CEs, 36 C.F.R. § 220.6, allows the Forest Service to combine two CEs to approve a proposed action, where no single CE could cover the proposed action alone. To ans......
  • Or. Wild v. United States Forest Serv.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 25 Septiembre 2024
    ...understory hardwoods in stands of southern pine; and (iv) Prescribed burning to reduce natural fuel build-up and improve plant vigor. 36 C.F.R. § 220.6. [3] See 36 C.F.R. 220.6(e)(12) (allowing harvesting of live trees for no more than 70 acres), (e)(13) (allowing the salvage of dead trees ......
3 firm's commentaries
  • Forest Service Releases Narrowly Tailored Update to Its NEPA Procedures
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 23 Noviembre 2020
    ...they conform with the new CEQ regulations. Below is a summary of the changes to the CEs. Consolidation of Special Use Authorizations, 36 CFR § 220.6(d)(11) The final rule consolidates two previous CEs—the CE covering amendments to or replacements of existing special use authorizations (form......
  • Logging Plan Not Categorically Excluded From Environmental Review Under NEPA
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • 1 Octubre 2020
    ...impact statement for the project, the Forest Service relied on a NEPA categorical exclusion for road repair and maintenance in 36 C.F.R. §220.6(d)(4). As of November 2019, logging had begun in two areas of the project and the Forest Service had finalized bidding on a third area. Plaintiff, ......
  • Logging Plan Not Categorically Excluded From Environmental Review Under NEPA
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 1 Octubre 2020
    ...impact statement for the project, the Forest Service relied on a NEPA categorical exclusion for road repair and maintenance in 36 C.F.R. §220.6(d)(4). As of November 2019, logging had begun in two areas of the project and the Forest Service had finalized bidding on a third area. Plaintiff, ......