Categorical exclusions
Currency | Current through May 31, 2023 |
Citation | 36 C.F.R. §220.6 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
2 cases
-
Friends of Inyo v. U.S. Forest Serv.
...743, 758, 135 S.Ct. 2699, 192 L.Ed.2d 674 (2015).ANALYSIS The parties dispute whether the Forest Service regulation enumerating CEs, 36 C.F.R. § 220.6, allows the Forest Service to combine two CEs to approve a proposed action, where no single CE could cover the proposed action alone. To ans......
-
Or. Wild v. United States Forest Serv.
...understory hardwoods in stands of southern pine; and (iv) Prescribed burning to reduce natural fuel build-up and improve plant vigor. 36 C.F.R. § 220.6. [3] See 36 C.F.R. 220.6(e)(12) (allowing harvesting of live trees for no more than 70 acres), (e)(13) (allowing the salvage of dead trees ......
3 firm's commentaries
-
Forest Service Releases Narrowly Tailored Update to Its NEPA Procedures
...they conform with the new CEQ regulations. Below is a summary of the changes to the CEs. Consolidation of Special Use Authorizations, 36 CFR § 220.6(d)(11) The final rule consolidates two previous CEs—the CE covering amendments to or replacements of existing special use authorizations (form......
-
Logging Plan Not Categorically Excluded From Environmental Review Under NEPA
...impact statement for the project, the Forest Service relied on a NEPA categorical exclusion for road repair and maintenance in 36 C.F.R. §220.6(d)(4). As of November 2019, logging had begun in two areas of the project and the Forest Service had finalized bidding on a third area. Plaintiff, ......
-
Logging Plan Not Categorically Excluded From Environmental Review Under NEPA
...impact statement for the project, the Forest Service relied on a NEPA categorical exclusion for road repair and maintenance in 36 C.F.R. §220.6(d)(4). As of November 2019, logging had begun in two areas of the project and the Forest Service had finalized bidding on a third area. Plaintiff, ......