24 C.F.R. §58.35 - Categorical exclusions

Cite as24 C.F.R. §58.35
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Lesser v. City of Cape May, Civil Action No. 99-5575(JAP)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • September 1, 2000
    ...no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact under NEPA is required . . . . " 24 C.F.R. § 58.35. This archive is a service of Rutgers University School ofLaw —...
  • Lesser v. City of Cape May, Civil Action No. 99-5575 (JAP).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • August 16, 2000
    ...which no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact under NEPA is required...." 24 C.F.R. § 58.35. --------------- ...
  • Castenson v. City of Harcourt, C 99-3031-MWB.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 8th Circuit. Northern District of Iowa
    • March 8, 2000
    ...of completion of an archaeological survey as part of an EA prior to filing a RROF. Instead, with exceptions stated in 24 C.F.R. §§ 58.34 and 58.35, "the responsible entity must prepare an EA in accordance with subpart E of this part." 24 C.F.R. § 58.36 (also providing that a party may proce......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT