24 CFR 58.35 - Categorical exclusions

Cite as24 CFR 58.35
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
35 practice notes
  • Separate Parts In This Issue Part II Housing and Urban Development Department,
    • United States
    • Federal Register April 25, 2003
    • April 25, 2003
    ...has determined that the activity is either Categorically Excluded, not subject to the related Federal laws and authorities pursuant to 24 CFR 58.35(b) or Exempt pursuant to 24 CFR 58.34. For Part 58 procedures, see http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/energyenviron/environment/index.cfm. For assi......
  • Grants and cooperative agreements; availability, etc.: Discretionary grant programs (SuperNOFA),
    • United States
    • Federal Register April 25, 2003
    • April 25, 2003
    ...has determined that the activity is either Categorically Excluded, not subject to the related Federal laws and authorities pursuant to 24 CFR 58.35(b) or Exempt pursuant to 24 CFR 58.34. For Part 58 procedures, see http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/energyenviron/environment/index.cfm. For assi......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register March 13, 2007
    • March 13, 2007
    ...which the responsible entity documents its findings of exemption or exclusion for the environmental review record (24 CFR 58.34(b) or 24 CFR 58.35(d)) until HUD has approved a ``Request for Release of Funds and Certification'' (RROF), form HUD-7015.15, on compliance with the National Enviro......
  • Environmental regulations; clarification and conforming amendments,
    • United States
    • Federal Register September 12, 2007
    • September 12, 2007
    ...assist homebuyers (24 CFR 50.19(b)(15)). This proposed rule would add a new categorical exclusion at 24 CFR 50.19(b)(18), as well as at 24 CFR 58.35(b)(8), for the giving [[Page 52266]] compensation assistance for loss during a Presidentially declared disaster. Such compensation benefit is ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
  • Castenson v. City of Harcourt, No. C 99-3031-MWB.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 8th Circuit. Northern District of Iowa
    • March 8, 2000
    ...of completion of an archaeological survey as part of an EA prior to filing a RROF. Instead, with exceptions stated in 24 C.F.R. §§ 58.34 and 58.35, "the responsible entity must prepare an EA in accordance with subpart E of this part." 24 C.F.R. § 58.36 (also providing that a party......
  • Lesser v. City of Cape May, Civil Action No. 99-5575 (JAP).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • August 16, 2000
    ...no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact under NEPA is required...." 24 C.F.R. § 58.35. --------------- ...
  • Lesser v. City of Cape May, Civil Action No. 99-5575(JAP)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • September 1, 2000
    ...environmental impact statement or environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact under NEPA is required . . . . " 24 C.F.R. § 58.35. This archive is a service of Rutgers University School ofLaw —...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT