11 CFR 110.13 - Candidate debates
| Cite as | 11 CFR 110.13 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
43 practice notes
-
Separate Parts In This Issue
Part II
Federal Election Commission,
...communications, including republication of materials from candidates, their committees or political parties, that meet the criteria of 11 CFR 110.13 regarding candidate debates and forums, and 11 CFR 114.4(c) regarding voter registration drives and voter In new section 109.21(f) the Commiss......
-
Coordinated and independent expenditures; transmittal to Congress,
...communications, including republication of materials from candidates, their committees or political parties, that meet the criteria of 11 CFR 110.13 regarding candidate debates and forums, and 11 CFR 114.4(c) regarding voter registration drives and voter In new section 109.21(f) the Commiss......
-
Becker v. Federal Election Commission, No. 00-2124
...2000 in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The plaintiffs challenge as ultra vires two FEC regulations, 11 C.F.R. 110.13 and 114.4(f), which Page 384 allow qualified nonprofit, nonpartisan organizations to accept corporate donations in staging presidential d......
-
Buchanan v. Federal Election Com'n, No. Civ.A. 00-1775(RWR).
...that debate-staging organizations be nonpartisan groups using "pre-established objective criteria" to select debate participants. 11 C.F.R. § 110.13(c). The FEC subsequently dismissed the complaint, finding that there was "no reason to believe" that the CPD was violating the law. Plaintiffs......
Request a trial to view additional results
27 cases
-
Becker v. Federal Election Com'n, No. Civ.A. 00-11192-PBS.
...campaign,1 brings this action challenging twenty-year-old regulations adopted by the Federal Election Commission ("FEC"), found at 11 C.F.R. §§ 110.13(a)(1) and 114.4(f)(1) and (3) ("the Debate Regulations"). Arguing that these Debate Regulations permit corporations to make contributions an......
-
Buchanan v. Federal Election Com'n, No. Civ.A. 00-1775(RWR).
...that debate-staging organizations be nonpartisan groups using "pre-established objective criteria" to select debate participants. 11 C.F.R. § 110.13(c). The FEC subsequently dismissed the complaint, finding that there was "no reason to believe" that the CPD was violating the law. Plaintiffs......
-
Natural Law Party of U.S. v. Federal Elec. Com'n, No. CIV. A. 98-1025(ESH).
...debates, provided they use "pre-established, objective criteria to determine which candidates may participate in a debate." 11 C.F.R. § 110.13(c). In addition, the regulations prohibit staging organizations from using "nomination by a political party as the sole objective criteria to determ......
-
Becker v. Federal Election Commission, No. 00-2124
...2000 in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The plaintiffs challenge as ultra vires two FEC regulations, 11 C.F.R. 110.13 and 114.4(f), which Page 384 allow qualified nonprofit, nonpartisan organizations to accept corporate donations in staging presidential d......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Last Week At The FEC: Accusations Of Partisanship And The Press Exemption Take Center Stage
...from participating in the debate based on the type of objective, pre-established, criteria outlined in the Commission's regulations at 11 C.F.R. §110.13. While the Commission unanimously agreed that the station had met these criteria, the three Republican Commissioner's argued that they sho......