37 C.F.R. 2.128 - Briefs at final hearing
| Cite as | 37 C.F.R. 2.128 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
76 practice notes
-
Yamaha Intern. Corp. v. Hoshino Gakki Co., Ltd., No. 87-1128
...proceedings. 37 C.F.R. Sec. 2.116(c), (d), (e). Briefs are filed by both parties, and the plaintiff party can file a reply brief. 37 C.F.R. Sec. 2.128. The oral hearing, following the briefing, corresponds to the oral summation in court proceedings. 37 C.F.R. Sec. II. Opposer's Burden for P......
-
Evolutionary Guidance Media R&D Inc. v. Cyberman Sec., 91249427
...not timely filed, exceeds the permissible page length, or violates formatting requirements as specified in Trademark Rule § 2.128(b), 37 C.F.R. § 2.128(b), none of which are present here.[30] Instead of moving to strike the brief, if EGM wished to object to arguments contained in Cyberman's......
-
Goya Foods, Inc. v. George Lage De Assis Rocha, 91247918
...submit evidence or a brief, and we do not construe his decision not to do so as a concession of the case. Trademark Rule 2.128(a)(1), 37 C.F.R. § 2.128(a)(1); Yazhong Investing Ltd. v. Multi-Media Tech. Ventures, Ltd., 126 U.S.P.Q.2d 1526, 1531 n.13 (TTAB 2018). [8] 10 TTABVUE 1 (ESTTA fili......
-
Ashland Licensing & Intellectual Property LLC v. Sunpoint International Group USA Corp., 92057294
...on the case in Petitioners' Reply Brief instead of utilizing an appendix or separate statement as provided by Trademark Rule 2.128(b), 37 C.F.R. § 2.128(b). Also, Petitioners contend that they attached evidence to their Reply Brief because it was necessary "to provide the Board with a clear......
Request a trial to view additional results
76 cases
-
Yamaha Intern. Corp. v. Hoshino Gakki Co., Ltd., No. 87-1128
...proceedings. 37 C.F.R. Sec. 2.116(c), (d), (e). Briefs are filed by both parties, and the plaintiff party can file a reply brief. 37 C.F.R. Sec. 2.128. The oral hearing, following the briefing, corresponds to the oral summation in court proceedings. 37 C.F.R. Sec. II. Opposer's Burden for P......
-
Evolutionary Guidance Media R&D Inc. v. Cyberman Sec., 91249427
...not timely filed, exceeds the permissible page length, or violates formatting requirements as specified in Trademark Rule § 2.128(b), 37 C.F.R. § 2.128(b), none of which are present here.[30] Instead of moving to strike the brief, if EGM wished to object to arguments contained in Cyberman's......
-
Goya Foods, Inc. v. George Lage De Assis Rocha, 91247918
...submit evidence or a brief, and we do not construe his decision not to do so as a concession of the case. Trademark Rule 2.128(a)(1), 37 C.F.R. § 2.128(a)(1); Yazhong Investing Ltd. v. Multi-Media Tech. Ventures, Ltd., 126 U.S.P.Q.2d 1526, 1531 n.13 (TTAB 2018). [8] 10 TTABVUE 1 (ESTTA fili......
-
Ashland Licensing & Intellectual Property LLC v. Sunpoint International Group USA Corp., 92057294
...on the case in Petitioners' Reply Brief instead of utilizing an appendix or separate statement as provided by Trademark Rule 2.128(b), 37 C.F.R. § 2.128(b). Also, Petitioners contend that they attached evidence to their Reply Brief because it was necessary "to provide the Board with a clear......
Request a trial to view additional results