2 C.F.R. §200.325 - Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity review

Cite as2 C.F.R. §200.325
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • San Antonio Hous. Auth. v. United States
    • United States
    • Court of Federal Claims
    • June 11, 2019
    ...are even restricted with respect to the particular bidding and bond terms they may use for, say, housing construction contracts. See 2 C.F.R. § 200.325; 24 C.F.R. § 1000.26.* * *Here, the underlying claim is not for presently due money damages. It is for larger strings-attached NAHASDA gran......
  • Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation v. United States
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • September 12, 2017
    ...are even restricted with respect to the particular bidding and bond terms they may use for, say, housing construction contracts. See 2 C.F.R. § 200.325 ; 24 C.F.R. § 1000.26. To label the disbursement of funds so thoroughly scrutinized and cabined as a remedy for "damages" would strain the ......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Revised UG Ups Micro-Purchase Level, Eases Award Termination, Addresses Indirect Rates
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • November 25, 2020
    ...Get Some Relief But Face Risk In the introduction to the readiness guide, COGR noted three “welcome and positive” changes, including 2 C.F.R. § 200.325 Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity review and 2 C.F.R. § 200.332 Requirements for pass-through “Prime awardees or pass-through ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT