36 CFR 60.1 - Authorization and expansion of the National Register
| Cite as | 36 CFR 60.1 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 practice notes
-
Norton v. Beasley, Civil Action 5:17-cv-351-CHB
...[Keeper of the National Register of Historic Places]' for inclusion in the National Register.” Salazar, 177 F.Supp.3d at 517 (quoting 36 C.F.R. § 60.1(b)(3)). The nomination process typically begins with the SHPO, who bears the responsibility of “identifying and nominating eligible properti......
-
Norton v. Beasley, Civil Action No. 5:17-cv-351-CHB
...of the National Register of Historic Places]’ for inclusion in the National Register." Salazar , 177 F. Supp. 3d at 517 (quoting 36 C.F.R. § 60.1(b)(3) ).The nomination process typically begins with the SHPO, who bears the responsibility of "identifying and nominating eligible properties to......
-
Clark Cnty.-Winchester Heritage Comm'n v. Norton, NO. 2017-CA-1172-MR
...Preservation Programs, submitted by the State Historic Preservation Officer and approved by the NPS," as occurred in this case. 36 C.F.R. § 60.1(b)(3). The regulations are very detailed with respect to how the State Historic Preservation Officer ("SHPO") is to identify, consider, and nomina......
-
Sierra Club v. Salazar, Civil Action No. 10-1513 (RBW)
...of “[n]ominations ... submitted by the [State Agency] and approved by the [Keeper]” for inclusion in the National Register. See 36 C.F.R. § 60.1(b)(3) (2015).Regarding the nomination component of the statute, the State Agency “is responsible for identifying and nominating eligible propertie......
Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
-
Norton v. Beasley, Civil Action 5:17-cv-351-CHB
...[Keeper of the National Register of Historic Places]' for inclusion in the National Register.” Salazar, 177 F.Supp.3d at 517 (quoting 36 C.F.R. § 60.1(b)(3)). The nomination process typically begins with the SHPO, who bears the responsibility of “identifying and nominating eligible properti......
-
Norton v. Beasley, Civil Action No. 5:17-cv-351-CHB
...of the National Register of Historic Places]’ for inclusion in the National Register." Salazar , 177 F. Supp. 3d at 517 (quoting 36 C.F.R. § 60.1(b)(3) ).The nomination process typically begins with the SHPO, who bears the responsibility of "identifying and nominating eligible properties to......
-
Clark Cnty.-Winchester Heritage Comm'n v. Norton, NO. 2017-CA-1172-MR
...Preservation Programs, submitted by the State Historic Preservation Officer and approved by the NPS," as occurred in this case. 36 C.F.R. § 60.1(b)(3). The regulations are very detailed with respect to how the State Historic Preservation Officer ("SHPO") is to identify, consider, and nomina......
-
Sierra Club v. Salazar, Civil Action No. 10-1513 (RBW)
...of “[n]ominations ... submitted by the [State Agency] and approved by the [Keeper]” for inclusion in the National Register. See 36 C.F.R. § 60.1(b)(3) (2015).Regarding the nomination component of the statute, the State Agency “is responsible for identifying and nominating eligible propertie......
Request a trial to view additional results