49 CFR 397.5 - Attendance and surveillance of motor vehicles

Cite as49 CFR 397.5
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
23 practice notes
  • Part III
    • United States
    • Federal Register April 13, 2007
    • April 13, 2007
    ...worksites and facilities because DOT already has attendant requirements for vehicles containing explosives on public highways at 49 CFR 397.5. Proposed paragraph (e)(3)(ii)(A) clarifies that the vehicle containing explosives is considered ``attended'' only when the driver or another respons......
  • Carrier Safety Fitness Determination
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 21, 2016
    • January 21, 2016
    ...49 CFR 396.17(g).................. Failing to promptly repair parts and accessories not meeting minimum periodic inspection standards. 49 CFR 397.5(a)................... Failing to ensure a motor containing Division 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3 (explosive) material is attended at all times by its drive......
  • Separate Parts In This Issue Part III Labor Department, Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
    • United States
    • Federal Register April 13, 2007
    • April 13, 2007
    ...worksites and facilities because DOT already has attendant requirements for vehicles containing explosives on public highways at 49 CFR 397.5. Proposed paragraph (e)(3)(ii)(A) clarifies that the vehicle containing explosives is considered ``attended'' only when the driver or another respons......
  • Hazardous materials: Explosives and other high-hazard materials; storage during transportation,
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 16, 2005
    • November 16, 2005
    ...storage, unless the motor vehicle is located on the motor carrier's property, the shipper or consignee's property, or at a ``safe haven'' (49 CFR 397.5). Under the FMCSRs, a ``safe haven'' is defined as an area specifically approved in writing by Federal, State, or local government authorit......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Walker v. Osterman Propane LLC, Civil Action No. 17-10416-PBS
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • October 21, 2019
    ...a 100-foot unobstructed view of their vehicles when they are on a public street or highway, or on the shoulder of a public highway. 49 C.F.R. § 397.5(c). However, propane delivery vehicles do not need to be "attended at all times," as they would if transporting an explosive material. 49 C.F......
  • Porter v. Petroleum Transp., Inc., CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10-cv-01384
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Southern District of West Virginia
    • September 4, 2012
    ...that he was not leaving his truck during his meal period because federal regulations prohibited him from leaving the truck unattended. 49 C.F.R. § 397.5 provides that a motor vehicle containing certain materials "must be attended at all times by its driver or a qualified representative of t......
  • Katz v. Quality Bldg. Servs., 2009 NY Slip Op 51548(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 7/6/2009), 100574-2009
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • July 6, 2009
    ...50 AD2d 35 [1st Dept 2008] [stating that although leaving tanker trucks with hazardous materials unattended on a public street violated 49 CFR 397.5, this violation did not create a substantial and specific danger to the public health or safety; the claim that the violation would present su......
  • Katz v. Quality Bldg. Servs., 2009 NY Slip Op 31499(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 7/6/2009), 100574-2009
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • July 6, 2009
    ...50 AD2d 35 [1st Dept 2008] [stating that although leaving tanker trucks with hazardous materials unattended on a public street violated 49 CFR 397.5, this violation did not create a substantial and specific danger to the public health or safety; the claim that the violation would present su......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • DOT Preempts California Meal And Rest Breaks Laws Under Federal Hazmat Regulations
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • October 5, 2018
    ...49 C.F.R. §§ 107.209, 171.1. See Federal Register, Vol. 83, No. 184 (Sept. 21, 2018) at 47961-47969. See 49 C.F.R. § 177.800(d). See 49 C.F.R. § 397.5. See 49 C.F.R. § See 49 C.F.R. § 107.211(a). The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Speci......
  • DOT Preempts California Meal and Rest Breaks Laws Under Federal Hazmat Regulations
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • October 5, 2018
    ...C.F.R. §§ 107.209, 171.1. 5 See Federal Register, Vol. 83, No. 184 (Sept. 21, 2018) at 47961-47969. 6 See 49 C.F.R. § 177.800(d). 7 See 49 C.F.R. § 397.5. 8 See 49 C.F.R. § 172.800-172.802. 9 See 49 C.F.R. § 107.211(a). Richard RahmKai-Ching Cha...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT