29 C.F.R. §1910.1001 - Asbestos
| Cite as | 29 C.F.R. §1910.1001 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
95 cases
-
Kesner v. Superior Court of Alameda Cnty., S219534
...for employers using asbestos. (OSHA, Standard for Exposure to Asbestos Dust, 37 Fed. Reg. 11320 (June 7, 1972) (OSHA Standard), amending 29 C.F.R. § 1910 et seq.; for current regulation, see 29 CFR § 1910.0001 et seq. (2016); see also Industrial Union Department, AFL – CIO v. Hodgson (D.C.C......
-
Metro-North Commuter R.R. v. Buckley
...to plaintiffs for whom employers or other sources (say, insurance now or in the future) might provide monitoring in any event. Cf. 29 CFR §1910.1001(l) (1996) (requiring employers to provide medical monitoring for workers exposed to asbestos). The Occupational Safety and Health Administrati......
-
United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v. Schuylkill Metals Corp., AFL-CIO-CLC
...MRP, pursuant to his power under the OSH Act. This standard provided MRP benefits that were as narrow in scope as the FMHSA MRP. 29 C.F.R. 1910.1001(g)(3)(iv) (1986) (a worker transferred because unable to wear a respirator must be "given ... the same seniority, status and rate of pay he ha......
-
Donovan v. Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers Intern. Union and Its Local 4-23, 83-4226
...fluid catalytic cracking unit of employees who were removing asbestos insulation or working in areas where asbestos was being removed (29 C.F.R. 1910.1001(f)(1), .1001(f)(2)(1), .1001(f)(3)(i)). Citation 2 charged the company with two nonserious violations based on (1) failure to guard elec......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
OSHA Announces Lockout/Tagout and Standards Improvement Project Developments
...but not require, the use of digital chest x-rays in the medical surveillance provisions of 29 C.F.R. §§ 1910.1018, 1910.1029, 1910.1045, 1910.1001, 1915.1001, 1926.1101, 1910.1027, and 1926.1127. In the third revision, OSHA replaced “roentgenogram” with “x-ray,” which reflects current termi......
1 books & journal articles
-
Courts as Policymakers: The Uneven Justice of Asbestos Mass Tort Litigation
...the 44. Emergency Standard for Exposure to Asbestos Dust, 36 Fed. Reg. 23207 (Dec. 2, 1971) (to be codiied at 29 C.F.R. pt. 1910). 45. 29 C.F.R. §1910.1001 (imposing an eight-hour TWA exposure limit of 5 f/cc efective immediately and declining to 2 f/cc in 1976). 46. Lemen & Landrigan, supr......
5 provisions
-
MO Register Vol. 43 No. 12. (Pages 1253-1412)
...(3) or more citations or violations of existing asbestos regulations within the last two (2) years; D. Three (3) or more violations of 29 CFR 1910.1001 or 29 CFR 1926.1101 within the last two (2) E. Fraud or failure to disclose facts relevant to their application; and F. Any other informati......
-
MO Register Vol. 44 No. 22. (Page 2811-2880)
...(3) or more citations or violations of existing asbestos regulations within the last two (2) years; D. Three (3) or more violations of 29 CFR 1910.1001 or 29 CFR 1926.1101 within the last two (2) years; E. Fraud or failure to disclose facts relevant to their application; and F. Any other in......
-
Chapter 216, HB 1402 – Revisor's Bill
...part 5 only for areas of public access:(I) Performance standards and practices for asbestos abatement which are not more stringent than 29 CFR 1910.1001 and 1926.58 1926.1101;SECTION 59. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 25-27.5-106, amend (2)(a)(II) as follows:25-27.5-106. License or registrat......
-
HB 89 – Changes the laws regarding natural resources
...and guidelines, the standards for workerprotection promulgated by the United States Occupational Safety andHealth Administration in 29 CFR 1910.1001, 1910.1200 and [1926.58] 1926.1101, the provisions ofsections 643.225 to 643.250 and the rules and regulationspromulgated thereunder. It is no......
Request a trial to view additional results