40 CFR 51.105 - Approval of plans

Cite as40 CFR 51.105
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
20 practice notes
3 cases
  • Sierra Club v. Tennessee Valley Authority, No. 3:02-cv-2279-VEH.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court of Northern District of Alabama
    • January 6, 2009
    ...2% de minimis rule throughout the period in question was an illegal, unilateral modification of the Alabama SIP, 42 U.S.C. § 7410(I); 40 C.F.R. § 51.105, and that Alabama's interpretation of its state implementation plan (SIP) cannot change the Act's mandate of continuous compliance. Clean ......
  • Sierra Club v. Tennessee Valley Authority, No. 04-15324.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
    • November 22, 2005
    ...by a state court... cannot be given effect, because ... revisions and variances of properly promulgated SIPs require EPA approval"); 40 C.F.R. § 51.105 ("Revisions of a plan, or any portion thereof, will not be considered part of an applicable plan until such revisions have been approved by......
  • Sierra Club v. United States Envtl. Prot. Agency, 21-3057
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • February 10, 2023
    ...not interfere with "any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further 3 progress." 42 U.S.C. §§ 7410(l), 7501(1); 40 C.F.R. § 51.105. Or, if the EPA finds that a SIP is "substantially inadequate" to attain or maintain a given NAAQS or to otherwise comply with the Act, ......
1 firm's commentaries
  • EPA Rejects Georgia SIP’s Automatic Rescission Powers
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • August 11, 2015
    ...rescinded federal standards in certain circumstances. In 2011, Georgia submitted its SIP revisions for approval by EPA as required by 40 CFR 51.105. The Georgia rules included a new definition for “subject to regulation,” which immediately vacated any federal air regulations repealed or oth......
1 books & journal articles
  • The State Implementation Plan Process
    • United States
    • Air pollution control and climate change mitigation law
    • August 18, 2010
    ...05-75269, 37 ELR 20026 (9th Cir. Jan. 30, 2007). 54. Hall v. EPA, 273 F.3d 1146, 1159, 32 ELR 20083 (9th Cir. 2001). 55. 40 C.F.R. §§51.104, 51.105. 56. 84 F.3d 304, 26 ELR 21157 (9th Cir. 1996). strate RFP for that standard. he court held that the two PM 10 NAAQS required independent treat......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT