8 CFR 208.14 - Approval, denial, referral, or dismissal of application

Cite as8 CFR 208.14
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
137 practice notes
  • Procedures for Credible Fear Screening and Consideration of Asylum, Withholding of Removal, and CAT Protection Claims by Asylum Officers
    • United States
    • Executive Office For Immigration Review
    • Invalid date
    ...of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(1)(A)(i). The noncitizen, may, however appeal an adverse decision to an IJ, and if necessary, to the BIA. 8 CFR 208.14(c)(5), 1003.1(b)(15), To allow asylum officers to carry out this new responsibility fully, additional changes to the regulations have been prop......
  • Executive Office for Immigration Review; Fee Review
    • United States
    • Executive Office For Immigration Review
    • Invalid date
    ...before EOIR. See INA 208(b)(3)(C), 8 U.S.C. 1158(b)(3)(C) (establishing ``initial jurisdiction'' with USCIS (emphasis added)); see also 8 CFR 208.14. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \33\ In addition, the Department notes that even if the Departmen......
  • Ali v. Reno, No. 93 Civ. 4661 (CLB) and 93 Civ. 4683 (CLB).
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • August 16, 1993
    ...security of the United States," then an otherwise meritorious application for asylum and withholding of deportation, must be denied. 8 C.F.R. § 208.14(c)(3) (asylum); 8 U.S.C. § 1253(h)(2)(D) (withholding of In this case, the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed the Immigration Judge's den......
  • Jie Hao v. Powell, No. 08-56421.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • September 2, 2010
    ...the Immigration and Naturalization Service in Los Angeles. An asylum officer had the authority to grant Lu's request for asylum. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.14(b). If the asylum officer did not decide to grant the request, Lu's case would be referred to a hearing before an immigration judge. See 8 C......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
128 cases
  • Ali v. Reno, No. 93 Civ. 4661 (CLB) and 93 Civ. 4683 (CLB).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • August 16, 1993
    ...security of the United States," then an otherwise meritorious application for asylum and withholding of deportation, must be denied. 8 C.F.R. § 208.14(c)(3) (asylum); 8 U.S.C. § 1253(h)(2)(D) (withholding of In this case, the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed the Immigration Judge's den......
  • Jie Hao v. Powell, No. 08-56421.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • September 2, 2010
    ...the Immigration and Naturalization Service in Los Angeles. An asylum officer had the authority to grant Lu's request for asylum. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.14(b). If the asylum officer did not decide to grant the request, Lu's case would be referred to a hearing before an immigration judge. See 8 C......
  • Maharaj v. Gonzales, No. 03-71066.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • June 9, 2006
    ...flight from persecution in Iran; and his stay in Spain was not a stopover en route to refuge in the United States. 20 F.3d at 882. 5. 8 C.F.R. § 208.14(c) (1997), the applicable regulation at the time Cheo was decided, If the evidence indicates that [one of the enumerated grounds for denial......
  • Carvajal-Munoz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, CARVAJAL-MUNO
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • September 12, 1984
    ...another country. See section 207(c)(1) of the Immigration Act, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1157(c)(1) (1982); 8 C.F.R. Sec. 208.8(f)(1)(i) (1984); 8 C.F.R. Sec. 208.14 (1984). In addition, as happened in one case, even though a decision was made that the alien would be subject to persecution if he or she......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Asylum, Withholding of Removal, and Relief Under the Convention Against Torture
    • United States
    • Immigration Relief: Legal Assistance for Noncitizen Crime Victims
    • July 31, 2014
    .../crisgwi /go ?action=offices .type &OfficeLocator .office _type=ZSY(lastvisitedApr. 10, 2014). 92. 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(a) (2013). 93. 8 C.F.R. § 208.14(c) (2013). Settlage_ImmRelief_20140717_09-11_Final.indd 101 7/17/14 9:12 AM 102 ChApter 6 will consider the asylum claim de novo, as well as ......
  • Chevron's Liberty Exception
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review Nbr. 104-2, January 2019
    • January 1, 2019
    ...(2012). 314. Id. § 1227(a)(1)(B). 315. Id. § 1227(a)(2) (setting out criminal grounds of removal). 316. Id. § 1229a(c)(4). 317. 8 C.F.R. § 208.14 (2018). 318. 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3); 8 C.F.R § 208.16. 319. 8 U.S.C. § 1229b. 320. See, e.g., Reyes v. Lynch, 842 F.3d 1125, 1129 (9th Cir. 2016) ......
  • In Re L-a-c-: a Pragmatic Approach to the Burden of Proof and Corroborating Evidence in Asylum Proceedings
    • United States
    • Georgetown Immigration Law Journal Nbr. 35-1, October 2020
    • October 1, 2020
    ...persecution may constitute a well-founded fear of persecution.”). 36. 8 C.F.R. § 208.13(a) (2020). 37. Id. (emphasis added). 38. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.14(a) (2020) (“[A]n immigration judge may grant or deny asylum in the exer-cise of discretion to an applicant who qualif‌ies as a refugee under......
  • Social Media and Online Persecution
    • United States
    • Georgetown Immigration Law Journal Nbr. 35-3, April 2021
    • April 1, 2021
    ...United States to the prohibition against granting asy-lum to serious criminals, persecutors, or terrorists. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 208.4, 208.13, 208.14, 1208.4, 1208.13, 1208.14 (2021). 16. See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a); see also Tamas-Mercea v. Reno, 222 F.3d 417, 424 (7th Cir. 2000) (not-ing that the ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT