34 CFR 395.3 - Application for designation as State licensing agency; content

Cite as34 CFR 395.3
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • Tamashiro v. Department of Human Services, No. 24552.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Hawai'i
    • October 27, 2006
    ...description of the methods for coordinating the State's vending facility program and the State's vocational rehabilitation program[.] 34 C.F.R. § 395.3(a) (emphases added). The "legal authority to administer the program" and "description of the methods for coordinating the State's vending f......
  • Committee of Blind Vendors v. District of Columbia, Civ. A. No. 88-0142-OG.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • April 17, 1990
    ...Act, DCRSA is required to provide on-the-job training and upward mobility training for licensed blind vendors. 20 U.S.C. § 107d-4; 34 C.F.R. §§ 395.3(a)(7), 395.11. The regulations further state that "effective programs of vocational and other training services, including personal and vocat......
  • State v. United States, No. 19-3397
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • January 25, 2021
    ...to blind persons operating those vending facilities "on Federal and other property in such State." 20 U.S.C. §§ 107a(a)(5), 107b ; see 34 C.F.R. § 395.3.Like other states, Ohio has enacted parallel legislation (Ohio's "mini-RSA") to expand the RSA's priority for blind merchants to state pro......
  • Delaware Dept. of Health and Social Services, Div. for Visually Impaired v. U.S. Dept. of Educ., No. 84-5614
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • November 20, 1985
    ...and administration of the Randolph-Sheppard program is required by 20 U.S.C. Sec. 107b-1(3) (1982) and 34 C.F.R. Sec. 395.14 (1984). 7 34 C.F.R. Sec. 395.3(11)(vii) (1984) requires an assurance that the state will "[s]ubmit to an arbitration panel those grievances of any vendor unresolved a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • Tamashiro v. Department of Human Services, No. 24552.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Hawai'i
    • October 27, 2006
    ...description of the methods for coordinating the State's vending facility program and the State's vocational rehabilitation program[.] 34 C.F.R. § 395.3(a) (emphases added). The "legal authority to administer the program" and "description of the methods for coordinating the State's vending f......
  • Committee of Blind Vendors v. District of Columbia, Civ. A. No. 88-0142-OG.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • April 17, 1990
    ...Act, DCRSA is required to provide on-the-job training and upward mobility training for licensed blind vendors. 20 U.S.C. § 107d-4; 34 C.F.R. §§ 395.3(a)(7), 395.11. The regulations further state that "effective programs of vocational and other training services, including personal and vocat......
  • State v. United States, No. 19-3397
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • January 25, 2021
    ...to blind persons operating those vending facilities "on Federal and other property in such State." 20 U.S.C. §§ 107a(a)(5), 107b ; see 34 C.F.R. § 395.3.Like other states, Ohio has enacted parallel legislation (Ohio's "mini-RSA") to expand the RSA's priority for blind merchants to state pro......
  • Delaware Dept. of Health and Social Services, Div. for Visually Impaired v. U.S. Dept. of Educ., No. 84-5614
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • November 20, 1985
    ...and administration of the Randolph-Sheppard program is required by 20 U.S.C. Sec. 107b-1(3) (1982) and 34 C.F.R. Sec. 395.14 (1984). 7 34 C.F.R. Sec. 395.3(11)(vii) (1984) requires an assurance that the state will "[s]ubmit to an arbitration panel those grievances of any vendor unresolved a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT