8 C.F.R. §245.2 - Application
| Cite as | 8 C.F.R. §245.2 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
475 cases
-
Hootkins v. Napolitano, Case No. CV 07-5696-CAS (MANx).
...to the United Kingdom, and that, therefore, his challenge to the denial of his I-485 is moot. Defs' 9th Cir. Mot. at 33. Under 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(a)(4)(B), "[t]he travel outside of the United States by an applicant for adjustment who is not under exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings......
-
Qiu v. Chertoff, Civil Action No. 07-123 (SRC).
...which have been cited to support the issuance of mandamus to compel adjudication, contain similar non-discretionary language. See 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(a)(5)(i) (2006) ("The applicant shall be notified of the decision of the director and, if the application is denied, the reasons for the denial"......
-
J.E.F.M. v. Holder, C14–1026 TSZ
...; however, once a minor is in removal proceedings, he or she may seek an adjustment of status only from the immigration judge or BIA. 8 C.F.R. §§ 245.2(a)(1) & 1245.2(a)(1)(i). In addition, Congress has crafted special rules for children from contiguous countries who are unaccompanied and (......
-
Joshua M. v. Barr, Civil Action No. 3:19cv770
...§ 245.1(a), and the application is deemed abandoned if the applicant leaves the country without having been granted advance parole. 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(a)(4)(ii)(A)-(B). Regulations similarly confirm that a "special immigrant described under section 101(a)(27)(J) of the Act shall be deemed, fo......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
-
Immigration Fact And Fiction For The U.S. Employer: Abrupt Change To Advance Parole Adjudications Without Clear Policy Objective A Modest Proposal
...[2] USCIS would claim that this policy was always in place, but not previously strictly implemented. [3] 8 CFR §245.2(a)(4)(ii)(B). [4] INA [5] Memo, Puleo, Assoc. Comm., Adjudications, CO 212.28-C (July 6, 1992), reprinted in 69 No. 26 Interpreter Releases 846, 851-52 (July 13, 1992). [6] ......
-
Immigration Fact and Fiction for the U.S. Employer: Abrupt Change to Advance Parole Adjudications Without Clear Policy Objective – A Modest Proposal
...name="_ftn2">[2] USCIS would claim that this policy was always in place, but not previously strictly implemented. [3] 8 CFR §245.2(a)(4)(ii)(B). [4] INA [5]this exemption to several other nonimmigrant categories (E-1, E-2, F-1, J-1 and M-1’s), which did not make it into the final rule. Id. ......
-
The Immigration-Abandonment Ploy — Fallout from a Fiddling Congress and Bickering Allies
...for a green card. Although the latter form of short-changing is moistened with the sprinkled holy water of an actual agency regulation (8 CFR § 245.2(a)(4)(ii)(A)-(D)), an adjustment of status applicant — like his nonimmigrant cousin — is still treated as having relinquished the desire to b......