37 CFR 1.31 - Applicant may be represented by one or more patent practitioners or joint inventors
| Cite as | 37 CFR 1.31 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
38 practice notes
-
Tube-Mac Indus., Inc. v. Campbell, 2:19-cv-01192-RJC
...evidence of assignment. The power of attorney relied upon by Plaintiffs further provides:This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.31, 1.32. and 1.33. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to process) an appli......
-
Tube-Mac Indus., Inc. v. Campbell, 2:19-cv-01192-RJC
...evidence of assignment. The power of attorney relied upon by Plaintiffs further provides:This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.31, 1.32. and 1.33. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to process) an appli......
-
Augustine v. Department of Veterans Affairs, No. 04-3162.
...to represent clients in administrative proceedings. See, e.g., 5 C.F.R. § 1201.31(b) (2004) (Merit Systems Protection Board); 37 C.F.R. § 1.31 (2004) (Patent and Trademark Office); 29 C.F.R. § 18.34 (2004) (Department of Labor); 20 C.F.R. § 410.685(b) (2004) (certain claims before the Socia......
-
In re Queen's Univ. at Kingston, No. 2015–145.
...applicant for patent ... may be represented by an attorney or agent authorized to practice before the Patent Office in patent cases.’ 37 CFR § 1.31.”) (citing Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1, 211, 9 Wheat. 1, 6 L.Ed. 23 (1824) (footnote omitted) (emphasis added)).In explaining its holding, the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
19 cases
-
Tube-Mac Indus., Inc. v. Campbell, 2:19-cv-01192-RJC
...evidence of assignment. The power of attorney relied upon by Plaintiffs further provides:This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.31, 1.32. and 1.33. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to process) an appli......
-
Tube-Mac Indus., Inc. v. Campbell, 2:19-cv-01192-RJC
...evidence of assignment. The power of attorney relied upon by Plaintiffs further provides:This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.31, 1.32. and 1.33. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to process) an appli......
-
Augustine v. Department of Veterans Affairs, No. 04-3162.
...to represent clients in administrative proceedings. See, e.g., 5 C.F.R. § 1201.31(b) (2004) (Merit Systems Protection Board); 37 C.F.R. § 1.31 (2004) (Patent and Trademark Office); 29 C.F.R. § 18.34 (2004) (Department of Labor); 20 C.F.R. § 410.685(b) (2004) (certain claims before the Socia......
-
In re Queen's Univ. at Kingston, No. 2015–145.
...applicant for patent ... may be represented by an attorney or agent authorized to practice before the Patent Office in patent cases.’ 37 CFR § 1.31.”) (citing Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1, 211, 9 Wheat. 1, 6 L.Ed. 23 (1824) (footnote omitted) (emphasis added)).In explaining its holding, the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
-
Working With Inventors Post-AIA: Managing Inventor Challenges And Preventing Common Mistakes
...Inventor's Oath and Prioritized Examination, with a Nod to the New Derivation Proceedings and a Consideration of the New Fee Proposal. See 37 CFR 1.31. Bd. Of Trs. Of Leland Stanford Junior Univ. v. Roche Molecular Sys., Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2188 Michael Best & Friedrich Blog Post, May 25, 2......
-
USPTO to Permit Assignees to File and Prosecute Patent Applications
...the invention has been assigned, the power of attorney should be executed on behalf of the assignee, not by the inventors. Moreover, new 37 CFR § 1.31 requires “a juristic entity (e.g., organizational assignee)” to be represented by a patent practitioner. Thus, when an assignee is the appli......
-
USPTO To Permit Assignees To File And Prosecute Patent Applications
...the invention has been assigned, the power of attorney should be executed on behalf of the assignee, not by the inventors. Moreover, new 37 CFR § 1.31 requires "a juristic entity (e.g., organizational assignee)" to be represented by a patent practitioner. Thus, when an assignee is the appli......
-
USPTO’s AIA Final Rules Permit Assignee Filing, Late Inventor Declarations, and Simplify Other Requirements
...to the effect that permitting the person to file the application “is appropriate to preserve the rights of the parties.” Under new 37 CFR §§ 1.31, 1.32, and 1.33, if the assignee is the applicant, the assignee (rather than the inventor(s)) can and should execute a power of attorney designat......
Request a trial to view additional results