28 CFR 72.3 - Applicability of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act

Cite as28 CFR 72.3
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
203 practice notes
  • U.S. v. Talada, Criminal Action No. 5:08-cr-00269.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Southern District of West Virginia
    • June 5, 2009
    ...sex offenders, including sex offenders convicted of the offense for which registration is required prior to the enactment of that Act." 28 C.F.R. § 72.3 (emphasis added). Therefore, at the time of Defendant's indictment, sex offenders were required to comply with SORNA even if their convict......
  • U.S. v. Vardaro, Cause No. CR-08-04-BLG-RFC.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Montana)
    • September 5, 2008
    ...including sex offenders convicted Page 1185 of the offense for which registration is required prior to the enactment of the Act." 28 C.F.R. § 72.3 SORNA also created a new federal offense for failing to register as a sex offender, with a maximum penalty of ten years imprisonment. 18 U.S.C. ......
  • U.S. v. Benevento, No. 2:07-cr-00136-RCJ-PAL.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Nevada
    • April 21, 2009
    ...were convicted. See Applicability of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, 72 Fed.Reg. 8894 (Feb. 28, 2007) (codified at 28 C.F.R. § 72 (2007)). On May 30, 2007, the Department of Justice issued proposed guidelines for interpreting SORNA, ("SMART Guidelines"), 72 Fed.Reg. 30,2......
  • U.S. v. Dean, Case No. 2:08-CR-50-WKW [WO].
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Middle District of Alabama
    • March 6, 2009
    ...the Act retroactivity applicable to all sex offenders and Dean's compliance does not rest on Alabama's implementation of the Act. See 28 C.F.R. § 72.3; United States v. Benton, 2008 WL 5273971, at *6 (S.D.Ohio Dec. 16, 2008) ("Despite Defendant's argument to the contrary, the Attorney Gener......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
198 cases
  • U.S. v. Talada, Criminal Action No. 5:08-cr-00269.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Southern District of West Virginia
    • June 5, 2009
    ...sex offenders, including sex offenders convicted of the offense for which registration is required prior to the enactment of that Act." 28 C.F.R. § 72.3 (emphasis added). Therefore, at the time of Defendant's indictment, sex offenders were required to comply with SORNA even if their convict......
  • U.S. v. Vardaro, Cause No. CR-08-04-BLG-RFC.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Montana)
    • September 5, 2008
    ...including sex offenders convicted Page 1185 of the offense for which registration is required prior to the enactment of the Act." 28 C.F.R. § 72.3 SORNA also created a new federal offense for failing to register as a sex offender, with a maximum penalty of ten years imprisonment. 18 U.S.C. ......
  • U.S. v. Benevento, No. 2:07-cr-00136-RCJ-PAL.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Nevada
    • April 21, 2009
    ...were convicted. See Applicability of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, 72 Fed.Reg. 8894 (Feb. 28, 2007) (codified at 28 C.F.R. § 72 (2007)). On May 30, 2007, the Department of Justice issued proposed guidelines for interpreting SORNA, ("SMART Guidelines"), 72 Fed.Reg. 30,2......
  • U.S. v. Dean, Case No. 2:08-CR-50-WKW [WO].
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Middle District of Alabama
    • March 6, 2009
    ...the Act retroactivity applicable to all sex offenders and Dean's compliance does not rest on Alabama's implementation of the Act. See 28 C.F.R. § 72.3; United States v. Benton, 2008 WL 5273971, at *6 (S.D.Ohio Dec. 16, 2008) ("Despite Defendant's argument to the contrary, the Attorney Gener......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Meet Me in the Middle: The Search for the Appropriate Standard of Review for the APA's Good Cause Exception
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review Nbr. 103-3, March 2018
    • March 1, 2018
    ...the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, 72 Fed. Reg. 8894, 8896–97 (Feb. 28, 2007) (to be codified at 28 C.F.R. pt. 72); see 28 C.F.R. § 72.3 (2017) (the official interim rulemaking by the Attorney General which applies the registration and notification requirements of SORNA ret......
  • Sex, cells, and SORNA: applying sex offender registration laws to sexting cases.
    • United States
    • William and Mary Law Review Vol. 52 Nbr. 5, April 2011
    • April 1, 2011
    ...Id. (quoting Applicability of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, 72 Fed. Reg. 8894, 8896 (Feb. 28, 2007) (codified at 28 C.F.R. 72.3 (2007))); see also Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84 (2003), reh'g denied, 538 U.S. 1009 (2003) (holding SORNA does not violate the Ex Post Facto Cla......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT