40 CFR 125.91 - Applicability

Cite as40 CFR 125.91
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 practice notes
  • Water pollution control: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System— Cooling water intake structures at Phase III facilities; requirements,
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 24, 2004
    • November 24, 2004
    ...of the United States. This is the same requirement EPA included in the Phase I and Phase II final rules (see, 40 CFR 125.81(a)(1), and 40 CFR 125.91(a)(1), respectively). Requirements for complying with section 316(b) will continue to be applied through NPDES Based on the Agency's review of......
  • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): Applications and Program Updates
    • United States
    • Federal Register May 18, 2016
    • May 18, 2016
    ...facility uses cooling water and the source of the cooling water. (Facilities that use a cooling water intake structure as described at 40 CFR 125.91 must comply with requirements at 40 CFR (10) An indication of whether the facility is requesting any of the variances at 40 CFR 122.21(m). (g)......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 24, 2004
    • November 24, 2004
    ...of the United States. This is the same requirement EPA included in the Phase I and Phase II final rules (see, 40 CFR 125.81(a)(1), and 40 CFR 125.91(a)(1), respectively). Requirements for complying with section 316(b) will continue to be applied through NPDES Based on the Agency's review of......
  • Riverkeeper, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., Docket No. 04-6692-ag(L).
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • January 25, 2007
    ...that large, existing power plants withdraw from rivers, lakes, and other waterways of the United States to cool their facilities. See 40 C.F.R. § 125.91(a). This cooling process requires power plants to extract billions of gallons of water per day from the nation's waters, thereby impinging......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
  • Riverkeeper, Inc. v. U.S. E.P.A., Docket No. 04-6692-ag(L).
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • January 25, 2007
    ...that large, existing power plants withdraw from rivers, lakes, and other waterways of the United States to cool their facilities. See 40 C.F.R. § 125.91(a). This cooling process requires power plants to extract billions of gallons of water per day from the nation's waters, thereby impinging......
  • Conocophillips Co v. United States Envtl. Prot. Agency, No. 06-60662.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • August 6, 2010
    ...§ 125.84(d)(1)). 18. Id. 19. Id. at 189. 20. Id. 21. Riverkeeper, Inc. v. EPA (Riverkeeper II), 475 F.3d 83, 92 (2d Cir.2007) (citing 40 C.F.R. § 125.91) rev'd and remanded by Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc., --- U.S. ----, 129 S.Ct. 1498, 173 L.Ed.2d 369 (2009). 22. Id. (quoting 40 C.F.......
  • Conocophillips Co v. United States Envtl. Prot. Agency, No. 06-60662
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • July 23, 2010
    ...17.Id. (quoting 40 C.F.R. § 125.84(d)(1)). 18.Id. 19. Id. at 189. 20. Id. 21. Riverkeeper II, 475 F.3d 83, 92 (2d Cir. 2007) (citing 40 C.F.R. § 125.91) rev'd and remanded by Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc., 129 S.Ct. 1498 (2009). 22. Id. (quoting 40 C.F.R. § 125.94(a)). 23. Id. at 93. 2......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT