40 CFR 6.101 - Applicability

Cite as40 CFR 6.101
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Update to the Regulations Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
    • United States
    • Council On Environmental Quality
    • Invalid date
    ...which EPA actions NEPA does not apply to, including actions under the Clean Air Act and certain actions under the Clean Water Act. See 40 CFR 6.101. The final rule codifies the agency practice of including this information in agency NEPA procedures but also provides agencies' flexibility to......
  • Sierra Club v. Flowers, No. 0323427CIV.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Southern District of Florida
    • March 22, 2006
    ...(CEQ) was established by NEPA with the authority to issue regulations interpreting the statute, which it did on November 29, 1978. See 40 C.F.R. 6.101(b), Department of Transp. v. Public Citizen, 541 U.S. 752, 757, 124 S.Ct. 2204, 159 L.Ed.2d 60 (2004). The CEQ regulations are found at 40 C......
  • Water pollution; discharge of pollutants (NPDES): sector general permit for industrial activities,
    • United States
    • Federal Register March 30, 2000
    • March 30, 2000
    ...for new sources as described in this section of the fact sheet must provide EPA with an Environmental Information Document pursuant to 40 CFR 6.101 prior to seeking coverage under this permit. This information shall be used by the Agency to evaluate the facility under the requirements of NE......
  • Revisions to California State Implementation Plans: Imperial County Air Pollution Control District
    • United States
    • Federal Register July 08, 2010
    • July 8, 2010
    ...OWD notes that EPA's action may be subject to NEPA evaluation. Response: EPA actions under the CAA are exempt from NEPA.\172\ \172\ See 40 CFR 6.101(b). SEO #3: OWD believes that EPA should address increased management costs for Imperial County's OHV recreation areas and the effects on OHV ......
1 cases
  • Sierra Club v. Flowers, No. 0323427CIV.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Southern District of Florida
    • March 22, 2006
    ...(CEQ) was established by NEPA with the authority to issue regulations interpreting the statute, which it did on November 29, 1978. See 40 C.F.R. 6.101(b), Department of Transp. v. Public Citizen, 541 U.S. 752, 757, 124 S.Ct. 2204, 159 L.Ed.2d 60 (2004). The CEQ regulations are found at 40 C......
3 provisions

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT