29 CFR 1926.402 - Applicability

Cite as29 CFR 1926.402
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Edison Elec. Institute v. Occupational Safety and Health Admin., No. 86-1486
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • June 7, 1988
    ...electric utilities, challenges three separate provisions of revised Subpart K as applied to the electric utility industry, namely, 29 C.F.R. Sec. 1926.402(b) (1987), limiting the scope of Subpart K; 29 C.F.R. Sec. 1926.432(a) (1987), requiring laboratory testing of certain equipment, and 29......
  • Brooks v. Rebarco, Inc., No. 8810SC197
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • October 4, 1988
    ...3. Whether there is substantial evidence in view of the entire record ... to support the Board's affirmance of a ... violation of 29 CFR 1926.402(a)(4); 4. Whether the decision of the Board is arbitrary and capricious. Unless provided for by specific statute, judicial review of administrati......
  • 95-126 La.App. 5 Cir. 7/25/95, McAdams v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana (US)
    • July 25, 1995
    ...for electrical equipment do not apply to existing permanent installations that were in place before construction activity commenced. 29 C.F.R. § 1926.402(a). In addition, Statewide was not required to exercise the heightened level of care required of utility companies, which are in the busi......
3 cases
  • Edison Elec. Institute v. Occupational Safety and Health Admin., No. 86-1486
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • June 7, 1988
    ...electric utilities, challenges three separate provisions of revised Subpart K as applied to the electric utility industry, namely, 29 C.F.R. Sec. 1926.402(b) (1987), limiting the scope of Subpart K; 29 C.F.R. Sec. 1926.432(a) (1987), requiring laboratory testing of certain equipment, and 29......
  • Brooks v. Rebarco, Inc., No. 8810SC197
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • October 4, 1988
    ...3. Whether there is substantial evidence in view of the entire record ... to support the Board's affirmance of a ... violation of 29 CFR 1926.402(a)(4); 4. Whether the decision of the Board is arbitrary and capricious. Unless provided for by specific statute, judicial review of administrati......
  • 95-126 La.App. 5 Cir. 7/25/95, McAdams v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana (US)
    • July 25, 1995
    ...for electrical equipment do not apply to existing permanent installations that were in place before construction activity commenced. 29 C.F.R. § 1926.402(a). In addition, Statewide was not required to exercise the heightened level of care required of utility companies, which are in the busi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT