23 CFR 633.102 - Applicability

Cite as23 CFR 633.102
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Frank Bros., Inc. v. Wisconsin Dept. of Transp., No. 03-3207.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • June 3, 2005
    ...prevailing wage rate for their job classification as determined by the Secretary of Labor. See 40 U.S.C. § 3142(b); 23 U.S.C. § 113; 23 C.F.R. § 633.102. In order to demonstrate compliance with the terms of the Davis-Bacon Act, contractors and subcontractors subject to the Act's prevailing ......
  • Transportation Equity Act for 21st Century; implementation: Contract administration; miscellaneous, obsolete, or redundant regulations removed,
    • United States
    • Federal Register February 13, 2004
    • February 13, 2004
    ...The FHWA is required to comply with FARS when the agency directly procures highway-related design or construction services. The FHWA issued 23 CFR 633, Subpart C, on June 24, 1974, at 39 FR 22418. This subpart deals primarily with supplementary language for the Standard Form 19A (Labor Stan......
  • Frank Bros. v. Wisconsin Department of Transp., No. 03-C-83-C.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. Western District of Wisconsin
    • July 18, 2003
    ...protections is found in 29 C.F.R. § 5. Incorporation of Form 1273 into the contract is itself required by a federal regulation. See 23 C.F.R. § 633.102(b) (stating that "required contract provisions contained in Form FHWA-1273 shall be physically incorporated in each Federal-aid highway con......
  • Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers v. Bd. of Defiance Cnty. Comm'rs, CASE NO. 4-13-05
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Ohio)
    • November 25, 2013
    ...of Labor." Frank Bros., Inc., v. Wisconsin Dept. of Transp., 409 F.3d 880, 882 (7th Cir. 2005); see 40 U.S.C. 3142(b); 23 U.S.C. 113; 23 C.F.R. 633.102. To show compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act, contractors and subcontractors who are subject to the federal wage provisions must give weekl......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
  • Frank Bros., Inc. v. Wisconsin Dept. of Transp., No. 03-3207.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • June 3, 2005
    ...prevailing wage rate for their job classification as determined by the Secretary of Labor. See 40 U.S.C. § 3142(b); 23 U.S.C. § 113; 23 C.F.R. § 633.102. In order to demonstrate compliance with the terms of the Davis-Bacon Act, contractors and subcontractors subject to the Act's prevailing ......
  • Frank Bros. v. Wisconsin Department of Transp., No. 03-C-83-C.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. Western District of Wisconsin
    • July 18, 2003
    ...protections is found in 29 C.F.R. § 5. Incorporation of Form 1273 into the contract is itself required by a federal regulation. See 23 C.F.R. § 633.102(b) (stating that "required contract provisions contained in Form FHWA-1273 shall be physically incorporated in each Federal-aid highway con......
  • Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers v. Bd. of Defiance Cnty. Comm'rs, CASE NO. 4-13-05
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Ohio)
    • November 25, 2013
    ...of Labor." Frank Bros., Inc., v. Wisconsin Dept. of Transp., 409 F.3d 880, 882 (7th Cir. 2005); see 40 U.S.C. 3142(b); 23 U.S.C. 113; 23 C.F.R. 633.102. To show compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act, contractors and subcontractors who are subject to the federal wage provisions must give weekl......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT