50 CFR 223.203 - Anadromous fish
| Cite as | 50 CFR 223.203 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
87 practice notes
-
Friends Of The River v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv. ., No. Civ. S-06-2845 LKK/JFM.
...was filed, take of steelhead and spring run Chinook was largely prohibited, but take of green sturgeon was not. See 50 C.F.R. §§ 223.101, 223.203. NMFS may relax the prohibition on take when take is incidental to activity for which NMFS has issued a “no jeopardy” BiOp. This relaxation takes......
-
California State Grange v. National Marine Fish., No. 1:06-CV-00308 OWW DLB.
...pursuant to municipal governments' ordinances or plans that NMFS determines will adequately provide for salmon conservation." 50 C.F.R. § 223.203(b)(12). The second challenged provision "creates an exemption from the take prohibition for non-federal forestry activities [undertaken] in Washi......
-
Audubon Soc'y of Portland v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., No. 03:11–cv–00494–HU.
...and conservation actions, and ensuring that such actions provide for the survival and recovery of listed species.’ ” Id. (quoting 50 C.F.R. § 223.203(b)(4)(i)(B)). They assert that use of the VSP criteria for this purpose has been upheld by the courts repeatedly. Dkt. # 19, p. 12 (citing Tr......
-
Soc'y v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., Case No. 3:12–cv–00431–HA.
...Significant Units, 65 Fed.Reg. 42, 422, 47, 475–81 (July 10, 2000); 70 Fed.Reg. at 37,194 (amending 2000 rule) (codified at 50 C.F.R. § 223.203). As a part of the 4(d) rule, NMFS established exceptions to § 9's take prohibition known as “4(d) Limits.” Id. Limit 5 creates an exemption from §......
Request a trial to view additional results
20 cases
-
Friends Of The River v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv. ., No. Civ. S-06-2845 LKK/JFM.
...was filed, take of steelhead and spring run Chinook was largely prohibited, but take of green sturgeon was not. See 50 C.F.R. §§ 223.101, 223.203. NMFS may relax the prohibition on take when take is incidental to activity for which NMFS has issued a “no jeopardy” BiOp. This relaxation takes......
-
California State Grange v. National Marine Fish., No. 1:06-CV-00308 OWW DLB.
...pursuant to municipal governments' ordinances or plans that NMFS determines will adequately provide for salmon conservation." 50 C.F.R. § 223.203(b)(12). The second challenged provision "creates an exemption from the take prohibition for non-federal forestry activities [undertaken......
-
Audubon Soc'y of Portland v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., No. 03:11–cv–00494–HU.
...and conservation actions, and ensuring that such actions provide for the survival and recovery of listed species.’ ” Id. (quoting 50 C.F.R. § 223.203(b)(4)(i)(B)). They assert that use of the VSP criteria for this purpose has been upheld by the courts repeatedly. Dkt. # 19, p. 12 (citing Tr......
-
Soc'y v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., Case No. 3:12–cv–00431–HA.
...Significant Units, 65 Fed.Reg. 42, 422, 47, 475–81 (July 10, 2000); 70 Fed.Reg. at 37,194 (amending 2000 rule) (codified at 50 C.F.R. § 223.203). As a part of the 4(d) rule, NMFS established exceptions to § 9's take prohibition known as “4(d) Limits.” Id. Limit 5 creates an exemption from §......
Request a trial to view additional results