11 CFR 106.4 - Allocation of polling expenses

Cite as11 CFR 106.4
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • Separate Parts In This Issue Part II Federal Election Commission,
    • United States
    • Federal Register August 08, 2003
    • August 8, 2003
    ...the decision to provide the goods or services, or was involved in ``substantial discussions'' about providing the goods or services. See 11 CFR 106.4(b); 109.21(b)(2), (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3). This approach was driven, in part, by the fact that the Commission did not in these rules want to t......
  • Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act; implementation: Presidential candidates and nominating conventions; public financing,
    • United States
    • Federal Register August 08, 2003
    • August 8, 2003
    ...the decision to provide the goods or services, or was involved in ``substantial discussions'' about providing the goods or services. See 11 CFR 106.4(b); 109.21(b)(2), (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3). This approach was driven, in part, by the fact that the Commission did not in these rules want to t......
  • Federal Election Commission,
    • United States
    • Federal Register July 29, 2002
    • July 29, 2002
    ...as the regulation providing instructions on allocation for candidate support, the revised citation is to 11 CFR part 106 because 11 CFR 106.4 is applicable to the allocation of polling 11 CFR 104.17 Reporting of Allocable Expenses by Party Committees As indicated in the Explanations and Jus......
  • Technological Modernization
    • United States
    • Federal Register November 02, 2016
    • November 2, 2016
    ...other regulatory references to specific technologies: ``computer column codes and the extent of computer tabulations'' of polling data, 11 CFR 106.4(e)(1); software that is ``provided or approved by the Commission,'' see 11 CFR 102.5(a)(3)(ii), 106.7(b), 300.30(c)(3)(ii); and ``programming ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
  • Shays v. U.S. Federal Election Com'n, Civil Action No. 06-1247 (CKK).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • September 12, 2007
    ...which recognize that polling information quickly loses its value with the passage of time." 71 Fed. Reg. at 33,205 (citing 11 C.F.R. § 106.4(g)). Yet this observation, while correct, "has no bearing on the issue before us." Shays I Appeal, 414 F.3d at 100. The Commission adduces no evidence......
  • Shays v. Federal Election Com'n, No. 07-5360.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • June 13, 2008
    ...polling data—arguably the campaign information that most quickly becomes obsolete—retains 528 F.3d 929 some value for 180 days. See 11 C.F.R. § 106.4(g). Yet the Commission inexplicably asserts that other types of campaign information—including some far more durable information such as dono......
  • FEDERAL ELECTION v. NAT. CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL, No. 84 Civ. 0866 (GLG).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • May 15, 1986
    ...nomination for election to the Senate in State A. May NCPAC contribute the poll to the Republican candidate in accordance with 11 CFR 106.4(b)? May NCPAC engage in any communication with the Republican candidate or with the Republican party committee in State Answer 8. The Commission is of ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT