11 CFR 106.5 - Allocation of expenses between federal and non-federal activities by national party committees
| Cite as | 11 CFR 106.5 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 practice notes
-
Federal Election Commission,
...would again be ``the official party structure,'' whether that is a matter of State law or the party's by- laws. Proposed Revisions to 11 CFR 106.5 The creation of a new part 300 to cover all aspects of party committee activity has rendered considerable portions of present section 106.5 eith......
-
Part III
...scope of activities and as a slight reduction to the 60 percent or 65 percent applicable to national party committees under previous 11 CFR 106.5(b)(2), prior to its sunset on December 31, 2002. See 11 CFR 106.5(h)(2003). If the final rule should take such an approach, what should the minim......
-
Federal Election Commission,
...the rules and are thus familiar to those active in this area. See, for example, 11 CFR 102.5 (``Federal'' and ``non-Federal'' accounts); 11 CFR 106.5 (``Federal'' and ``non- Federal'' disbursements). The terms ``regulated'' and ``unregulated'' could also be subject to different interpretati......
-
Political committee status,
...scope of activities and as a slight reduction to the 60 percent or 65 percent applicable to national party committees under previous 11 CFR 106.5(b)(2), prior to its sunset on December 31, 2002. See 11 CFR 106.5(h)(2003). If the final rule should take such an approach, what should the minim......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, No. 02–582 CKK,KLH,RJL
...generic voter drive expenses13 to their federal accounts in presidential election years and 60% in non-presidential election years. 11 C.F.R. §§ 106.5(b)(2)(i), (ii)(1991). Senate and House committees were to allocate these expenses on the basis of the ratio of federal expenditures to total......
-
Shays v. F.E.C., No. CIV.A. 02-1984(CKK).
...as well as one which characterizes voter registration and get-out-the vote drives as those "that urge the general public to register," 11 C.F.R. § 106.5(a)(2)(iv) (emphasis added). Finally, Plaintiffs point out that the FEC in an Advisory Opinion, wrote that "`[r]egistration' and `get-out-t......
-
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, No. 02-582 CKK,KLH,RJL
...generic voter drive expenses13 to their federal accounts in presidential election years and 60% in non-presidential election years. 11 C.F.R. §§ 106.5(b)(2)®, (ii)(1991). Senate and House committees were to allocate these expenses on the basis of the ratio of federal expenditures to total f......
-
McConnell v. Federal Election Comm'n, No. 02-1674.
...pre-BCRA allocation rules, and thus had to be funded in part by hard money, because they affect federal as well as state elections. See 11 CFR § 106.5 (2002). As a practical matter, BCRA merely codifies the principles of the FEC's allocation regime while at the same time justifiably adjusti......
Request a trial to view additional results