19 CFR 351.524 - Allocation of benefit to a particular time period
| Cite as | 19 CFR 351.524 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
166 practice notes
-
Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. U.S., No. 06-1044.
...receives a non-recurring benefit, as occurred here, the benefit must be amortized over the "average useful life" of the subsidy. 19 C.F.R. § 351.524(b)(1)-(d). Although countervailing duties must be "equal to" countervailing subsidies, the two concepts are not functionally interchangeable.5......
-
Posco v. United States, Slip Op. 18–18
...subsidies: recurring and non-recurring. Commerce allocates recurring benefits to the year in which they were received. 19 C.F.R. § 351.524(a). Commerce allocates non-recurring benefits "over the number of years corresponding to the [AUL] of renewable physical assets" used in the production ......
-
Özdemir Boru San. Ve Tic. Ltd. v. United States, Slip Op. 17–142
...at 24,16 Initiation Checklist at 25, Questionnaire at 14, and thus a recurring subsidy, the benefit is expensed in the year received. 19 C.F.R. § 351.524(a) (2015) ("[Commerce] will allocate (expense) a recurring benefit to the year in which the benefit is received."); Pl.'s Br. at 23. Ther......
-
Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. U.S., No. Slip Op. 00-66.
...useful life ("AUL") of a firm's assets) when determining a subsidy rate for the period of investigation (in this case, 1997). See 19 C.F.R. § 351.524(b) (2000) (codifying the Department's practice of allocating non-recurring benefits). It is unrelated and irrelevant to whether a party has m......
Request a trial to view additional results
21 cases
-
Özdemir Boru San. Ve Tic. Ltd. v. United States, Slip Op. 17–142
...at 24,16 Initiation Checklist at 25, Questionnaire at 14, and thus a recurring subsidy, the benefit is expensed in the year received. 19 C.F.R. § 351.524(a) (2015) ("[Commerce] will allocate (expense) a recurring benefit to the year in which the benefit is received."); Pl.'s Br. at 23. Ther......
-
Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. U.S., No. Slip Op. 00-66.
...useful life ("AUL") of a firm's assets) when determining a subsidy rate for the period of investigation (in this case, 1997). See 19 C.F.R. § 351.524(b) (2000) (codifying the Department's practice of allocating non-recurring benefits). It is unrelated and irrelevant to whether a party has m......
-
Posco v. United States, Slip Op. 18–18
...subsidies: recurring and non-recurring. Commerce allocates recurring benefits to the year in which they were received. 19 C.F.R. § 351.524(a). Commerce allocates non-recurring benefits "over the number of years corresponding to the [AUL] of renewable physical assets" used in the production ......
-
TMK IPSCO v. United States, Slip Op. 16-62
...the benefit “to a firm over the number of years corresponding to the average useful life (“AUL”) of renewable physical assets.” 19 C.F.R. § 351.524(b)(1). Commerce determined the AUL for the production assets for subject merchandise is 15 years. Final Decision Memo at 6. Therefore, by selec......
Request a trial to view additional results