42 CFR 405.1875 - Administrator review

Cite as42 CFR 405.1875
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
148 practice notes
  • Lenox Hill Hospital v. Shalala, Civil Action No. 99-CV03087SSH.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • November 14, 2000
    ...Administrator of the Health Care Financing Administration (the "Administrator"). See 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(f)(1); 42 C.F.R. §§ 405.1801(a), 405.1875(a)(1). If the jurisdictional prerequisites are met, but the Board determines — "on its own motion or at the request of a provider of services" — ......
  • Cmty. Health Sys., Inc. v. Burwell, Civil Action No. 14–1432 (BAH)
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • July 7, 2015
    ...Id. § 1395oo(f)(1). The Secretary has delegated responsibility for hearing appeals from PRRB decisions to the CMS Administrator. See 42 C.F.R. § 405.1875 ; Mercy Home Health v. Leavitt, 436 F.3d 370, 374 (3d Cir.2006). The dissatisfied provider, or, as in this case, a group of dissatisfied ......
  • Cove Associates Joint Venture v. Sebelius, No. 1:10-cv-01316 (BJR)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • March 26, 2012
    ...1395oo(f). The Secretary has delegated her authority to review PRRB decisions to the Administrator of CMS. 2 U.S.C. § 1395oo(f)(1); 42 C.F.R. § 405.1875(a)(1). A provider dissatisfied with a decision of the PRRB or the Secretary, if the Secretary reviews the Board's decision, may seek judic......
  • Bartlett Memorial Medical Center, Inc. v. Thompson, No. 02-6142.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • October 20, 2003
    ...was issued to Plaintiffs and informed them of their rights to seek judicial review of its decision under 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(f)(1) and 42 C.F.R. § 405.1875 and Before the district court, Plaintiffs sought to challenge Ruling 97-2's instruction forbidding fiscal intermediaries to reopen NPRs,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
148 cases
  • Lenox Hill Hospital v. Shalala, Civil Action No. 99-CV03087SSH.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • November 14, 2000
    ...Administrator of the Health Care Financing Administration (the "Administrator"). See 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(f)(1); 42 C.F.R. §§ 405.1801(a), 405.1875(a)(1). If the jurisdictional prerequisites are met, but the Board determines — "on its own motion or at the request of a provider of services" — ......
  • Cmty. Health Sys., Inc. v. Burwell, Civil Action No. 14–1432 (BAH)
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • July 7, 2015
    ...Id. § 1395oo(f)(1). The Secretary has delegated responsibility for hearing appeals from PRRB decisions to the CMS Administrator. See 42 C.F.R. § 405.1875 ; Mercy Home Health v. Leavitt, 436 F.3d 370, 374 (3d Cir.2006). The dissatisfied provider, or, as in this case, a group of dissatisfied ......
  • Cove Associates Joint Venture v. Sebelius, No. 1:10-cv-01316 (BJR)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • March 26, 2012
    ...1395oo(f). The Secretary has delegated her authority to review PRRB decisions to the Administrator of CMS. 2 U.S.C. § 1395oo(f)(1); 42 C.F.R. § 405.1875(a)(1). A provider dissatisfied with a decision of the PRRB or the Secretary, if the Secretary reviews the Board's decision, may seek judic......
  • Bartlett Memorial Medical Center, Inc. v. Thompson, No. 02-6142.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • October 20, 2003
    ...was issued to Plaintiffs and informed them of their rights to seek judicial review of its decision under 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(f)(1) and 42 C.F.R. § 405.1875 and Before the district court, Plaintiffs sought to challenge Ruling 97-2's instruction forbidding fiscal intermediaries to reopen NPRs,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT