42 C.F.R. §405.1875 - Administrator review

Cite as42 C.F.R. §405.1875
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
153 cases
  • Jordan Hosp. v. Leavitt, Civil Action No. 07-1160 (JDB).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • August 15, 2008
    ...will be granted. See id. § 413.30(d). The provider may then appeal the agency's decision to the Board. See 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(f)(1); 42 C.F.R. § 405.1875. Once the Board issues its decision, it is final unless the Administrator chooses to review it. See 42 C.F.R. § 405.1877(a). In that situ......
  • Mountain States Health Alliance v. Burwell, Civil Action No. 13-641 (RDM)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • September 10, 2015
    ...the Secretary unless the CMS Administrator, acting on the Secretary's behalf, elects to review it. See 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo (f)(1) ; 42 C.F.R. § 405.1875(a)(1). A provider that is dissatisfied with the Secretary's final decision may seek judicial review in federal district court. 42 U.S.C. § ......
  • Mercy Gen. Hosp. v. Azar, Civil Action No. 16-99 (RBW)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • September 29, 2018
    ...[via the CMS Administrator (the "Administrator"),] ... reverses, affirms, or modifies the Board's decision." Id. § 1395oo(f)(1) ; 42 C.F.R. § 405.1875 (recognizing that the Secretary has delegated to the Administrator his authority to review the Board's decisions). Finally, a provider may "......
  • Bartlett Memorial Medical Center, Inc. v. Thompson, 02-6142.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • October 20, 2003
    ...was issued to Plaintiffs and informed them of their rights to seek judicial review of its decision under 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(f)(1) and 42 C.F.R. § 405.1875 and Before the district court, Plaintiffs sought to challenge Ruling 97-2's instruction forbidding fiscal intermediaries to reopen NPRs,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT