16 CFR 436.9 - Additional prohibitions

Cite as16 CFR 436.9
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
25 practice notes
  • Franchise Relationship Laws
    • United States
    • Fundamentals of Franchising, Fourth Edition -
    • January 1, 2015
    ...Prot., Staff Report to the Federal Trade Commission and Proposed Revised Trade Regulation Rule 9–10 (Aug. 2004). 3. Id. at 258–59. 4. 16 C.F.R. § 436.9(h). 5. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1221-1225. 6. 15 U.S.C. §§ 2801-2806. 7. 15 U.S.C. § 2804. 8. Seckler v. Star Enterprise, 124 F.3d 1399, 1404 (11th Cir......
  • Franchise Encroachment
    • United States
    • American Business Law Journal Nbr. 47-2, June 2010
    • June 1, 2010
    ...discussion of fraud in franchising and problems with the FTC Rule priorto the 2007 amendments, see Burke & Abel, supra note 172.18716 C.F.R. § 436.9(h) (2009).2010 / Franchise Encroachment claim.188Franchisors who draft contracts carefully, as well as insist that theiragents avoid misleadin......
  • Vino 100, LLC v. Smoke on Water, LLC, Civil Action No. 09–4983.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • March 30, 2012
    ...specifically, defendants maintain that plaintiffs violated a Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) regulation commonly known as Rule 436. See16 CFR § 436.9(c). Generally, Rule 436 specifies that franchisors must provide to prospective franchisees disclosure documents that contain prescribed info......
  • Franchising and the Parol Evidence Rule
    • United States
    • American Business Law Journal Nbr. 50-3, September 2013
    • September 1, 2013
    ...disclaimer prohibition, rather than a total ban [on integration clauses and waivers], iswarranted.”)175Id. at 15530 (describing 16 C.F.R. § 436.9(h) (West 2013)).696 Vol. 50 / American Business Law law176 or any specific earnings claims the franchisor voluntarily offers toprospective franchi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • Vino 100, LLC v. Smoke on Water, LLC, Civil Action No. 09–4983.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • March 30, 2012
    ...specifically, defendants maintain that plaintiffs violated a Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) regulation commonly known as Rule 436. See16 CFR § 436.9(c). Generally, Rule 436 specifies that franchisors must provide to prospective franchisees disclosure documents that contain prescribed info......
  • Cluck-U Chicken, Inc. v. Cluck-U Corp., Case No.: 8:15-CV-2274-T-MAP
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Florida
    • June 6, 2017
    ...relying consumer." Zlotnick v. Premier Sale Grp. , 480 F.3d 1281, 1284 (11th Cir. 2007). Citing Federal Trade Commission regulation 16 C.F.R. § 436.9, incorporated into FDUTPA through Fla. Stat. § 501.203(3), Plaintiffs argue it was a deceptive act for Defendants to misrepresent the initial......
  • Vino 100, LLC v. Smoke on the Water, LLC, CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-4983
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • March 30, 2012
    ...defendants maintain that plaintiffs violated a Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") regulation commonly known as Rule 436. See 16 CFR § 436.9(c). Generally, Rule 436 specifies that franchisors must provide to prospective franchisees disclosure documents that contain prescribed information about......
  • Camac v. Dontos, No. 05–11–00765–CV.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • June 12, 2012
    ...Camac is one of ten defendants 2 the Dontoses sued alleging violations of the Federal Trade Commission franchise rule, 16 C.F.R. §§ 436.2, 436.9 (2004), the Texas Business Opportunity Act, Tex. Bus. & Com.Code Ann. § 51.301 (West 2009), the Deceptive Trade Practices–Consumer Protection Act,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • ABCs of Franchising: Who Is a Franchisor?
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • June 29, 2018
    ...FTC Act, allowing the FTC to commence civil or criminal enforcement proceedings on behalf of franchisees against a franchisor. See e.g., 16 C.F.R. 436.9. Moreover, many state franchise laws provide state regulatory agencies with power to bring both civil and criminal enforcement proceedings......
5 books & journal articles
  • Franchise Encroachment
    • United States
    • American Business Law Journal Nbr. 47-2, June 2010
    • June 1, 2010
    ...discussion of fraud in franchising and problems with the FTC Rule priorto the 2007 amendments, see Burke & Abel, supra note 172.18716 C.F.R. § 436.9(h) (2009).2010 / Franchise Encroachment claim.188Franchisors who draft contracts carefully, as well as insist that theiragents avoid misleadin......
  • Franchise Relationship Laws
    • United States
    • Fundamentals of Franchising, Fourth Edition -
    • January 1, 2015
    ...Prot., Staff Report to the Federal Trade Commission and Proposed Revised Trade Regulation Rule 9–10 (Aug. 2004). 3. Id. at 258–59. 4. 16 C.F.R. § 436.9(h). 5. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1221-1225. 6. 15 U.S.C. §§ 2801-2806. 7. 15 U.S.C. § 2804. 8. Seckler v. Star Enterprise, 124 F.3d 1399, 1404 (11th Cir......
  • Franchising and the Parol Evidence Rule
    • United States
    • American Business Law Journal Nbr. 50-3, September 2013
    • September 1, 2013
    ...disclaimer prohibition, rather than a total ban [on integration clauses and waivers], iswarranted.”)175Id. at 15530 (describing 16 C.F.R. § 436.9(h) (West 2013)).696 Vol. 50 / American Business Law law176 or any specific earnings claims the franchisor voluntarily offers toprospective franchi......
  • Franchise Disclosure and Sales Compliance
    • United States
    • Franchise Law Compliance Manual, Second Edition
    • January 1, 2011
    ...¶¶ 3140.01(d), 3130.03(c)(iii)(9). 96. CAL. CORP. CODE § 31105; MD. CODE ANN., BUS. REG. § 02.02.08.10.B. 97. 16 C.F.R. § 436.2. 98. 16 C.F.R. § 436.9(e). 99. Bus. Franchise Guide (CCH) ¶ 6061. 100. But see CAL. CORP. CODE § 31303, Bus. Franchise Guide (CCH) ¶ 3050.64 (provides for cure of ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT