40 C.F.R. §49.11 - Actions under section 301(d)(4) authority
| Cite as | 40 C.F.R. §49.11 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Arizona Public Service Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., No. 07-9546.
...criteria of 40 CFR part 51, Appendix V, or does not 562 F.3d 1120 receive EPA approval of a submitted tribal implementation plan. 40 C.F.R. § 49.11(a). Here, the Navajo Nation did not submit a tribal plan, and the Plant's emissions remained officially unregulated, although the Plant volunta......
-
Yazzie v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 14-73100
...without unreasonable delay such Federal implementation plan provisions as are necessary or appropriate to protect air quality." 40 C.F.R. § 49.11(a).The TAR also exempted tribes from certain CAA requirements because States were farther along in "developing air planning and implementation ex......
-
Michigan v. U.S. E.P.A., 08-2582.
...plan, the EPA will promulgate a FIP to govern the tribal lands until the Tribe creates a valid TIP, if and when it wishes to do so. 40 C.F.R. § 49.11. Both a State and a Tribe are authorized to redesignate land within their boundaries to Class I status. 42 U.S.C. § 7474(a), (c). Redesignati......
-
WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 13–9524.
...the Tribal Authority Rule that it was “necessary or appropriate” to establish the BART for NOx and PM emissions. See id. at 64222–23; 40 C.F.R. § 49.11(a) (2013). Both NOx and PM contribute to visibility impairment. SeeProposed FIP, 75 Fed.Reg. at 64224. The EPA considered the five factors ......
Request a trial to view additional results