40 CFR 230.75 - Actions affecting plant and animal populations
| Cite as | 40 CFR 230.75 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Water pollution control:
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Cooling water intake structures at Phase III facilities; requirements,
...on the aquatic ecosystem'' (40 CFR 230.10(d)). EPA has specifically defined minimization steps to include environmental restoration. See 40 CFR 230.75(d) (``Habitat development and restoration techniques can be used to minimize adverse impacts and to compensate for destroyed Moreover, at th......
-
Part II
...on the aquatic ecosystem'' 40 CFR 230.10(d). EPA has specifically defined minimization steps to include environmental restoration. See 40 CFR 230.75(d) (``Habitat development and restoration techniques can be used to minimize adverse impacts and to compensate for destroyed Moreover, at the ......
-
Water pollution control:
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Cooling water intake structures at Phase II existing facilities; requirements,
...on the aquatic ecosystem'' 40 CFR 230.10(d). EPA has specifically defined minimization steps to include environmental restoration. See 40 CFR 230.75(d) (``Habitat development and restoration techniques can be used to minimize adverse impacts and to compensate for destroyed Moreover, at the ......
-
Part II
...of aquatic resources) is in the 404(b)(1) Guidelines as an action to minimize adverse effects on populations of plants and animals (see 40 CFR 230.75(d)). Compensatory mitigation may also be required to satisfy other legal requirements, as a result of the public interest review process, or ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 cases
-
Ohio Val. Envir. Coal. v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng., Civil Action No. 3:05-0784.
...measures. Mitigation techniques previously established to be effective in similar circumstances should be used where possible. 40 C.F.R. § 230.75(d). Where the effectiveness of particular mitigation techniques is unproven, the Corps must limit their use to a small scale to allow for correct......
1 books & journal articles
-
Practicable Alternatives for Wetlands Development Under the Clean Water Act
...46 (discussing implementation of the mitigation rule). For a chart showing wetland acres permitted and mitigated, see id. at 27. See 40 C.F.R. §230.75 (2018) (specifying compen-sation techniques).189. For a case taking this position, see Butte Envtl. Council v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, 62......