24 CFR 982.312 - Absence from unit

Cite as24 CFR 982.312
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 practice notes
  • Part IV
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 13, 2005
    • October 13, 2005
    ...than the maximum period permitted by PHA policy. (PHA termination of assistance actions due to family absence from the unit is subject to 24 CFR 982.312, except that the HAP contract is not terminated if the family is absent for longer than the maximum period Sec. 983.257 Owner termination ......
  • Public and Indian housing: Project-Based Voucher Program,
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 13, 2005
    • October 13, 2005
    ...than the maximum period permitted by PHA policy. (PHA termination of assistance actions due to family absence from the unit is subject to 24 CFR 982.312, except that the HAP contract is not terminated if the family is absent for longer than the maximum period Sec. 983.257 Owner termination ......
  • Notice of Regulatory Waiver Requests Granted for the Second Quarter of Calendar Year 2014
    • United States
    • Federal Register September 03, 2014
    • September 3, 2014
    ...of Housing and Urban Development, 550 12th Street SW., Suite 100, Washington, DC 20410, telephone (202) 475-7907. Regulation: 24 CFR 982.312(a). Project/Activity: New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (NYCDHPD), New York City, Nature of Requirement: HUD's regulati......
  • Shortt v. Pritchett, 2015-10316, Index No. 2209/15.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • November 1, 2017
    ...more than 180 days, and that he had failed to notify the Agency of his absence in violation of his obligations under the Program (see 24 C.F.R. 982.312 [d][1]; 82.551[i] ).The petitioner requested a hearing (see 24 C.F.R. 982.555 ) and also asked for a reasonable accommodation under the Fai......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • Shortt v. Pritchett, 2015-10316, Index No. 2209/15.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • November 1, 2017
    ...more than 180 days, and that he had failed to notify the Agency of his absence in violation of his obligations under the Program (see 24 C.F.R. 982.312 [d][1]; 82.551[i] ).The petitioner requested a hearing (see 24 C.F.R. 982.555 ) and also asked for a reasonable accommodation under the Fai......
  • KST Realty LLC v. Olatoye
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • July 14, 2015
    ...based upon the evidence available, that E.M. was absent for more than a “brief period” and more than “180 consecutive calendar days” (24 C.F.R. § 982.312). “[A]n agency's interpretation of the statutes it administers must be upheld absent demonstrated irrationality or unreasonableness.” (Se......
  • KST Realty LLC v. Olatoye, 100841/14
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • July 14, 2015
    ...based upon the evidence available, that E.M. was absent for more than a “brief period” and more than “180 consecutive calendar days” (24 C.F.R. § 982.312 ). “[A]n agency's interpretation of the statutes it administers must be upheld absent demonstrated irrationality or unreasonableness.” (S......
  • Shortt v. Pritchett, 2015-10316
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • November 1, 2017
    ...for more than 180 days, and that he had failed to notify the Agency of his absence in violation of his obligations under the Program (see 24 CFR 982.312[d][1]; 82.551[i]). The petitioner requested a hearing (see 24 CFR 982.555) and also asked for a reasonable accommodation under the Fair Ho......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT