29 CFR 785.7 - Judicial construction.
Code of Federal Regulations - Title 29: Labor (2010)
Linked as:Code of Federal Regulations - Title 29: Labor (2010)
Linked as:
Text
Title 29: Labor
Subtitle B: Regulations Relating to Labor (Continued)
CHAPTER V: WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
SUBCHAPTER B: STATEMENTS OF GENERAL POLICY OR INTERPRETATION NOT DIRECTLY RELATED TO REGULATIONS
PART 785: HOURS WORKED
Subpart B: Principles for Determination of Hours Worked
785.7 - Judicial construction.The United States Supreme Court originally stated that employees subject to the act must be paid for all time spent in ?physical or mental exertion (whether burdensome or not) controlled or required by the employer and pursued necessarily and primarily for the benefit of the employer of his business.? (Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad Co. v. Muscoda Local No. 123, 321 U. S. 590 (1944)) Subsequently, the Court ruled that there need be no exertion at all and that all hours are hours worked which the employee is required to give his employer, that ?an employer, if he chooses, may hire a man to do nothing, or to do nothing but wait for something to happen. Refraining from other activity often is a factor of instant readiness to serve, and idleness plays a part in all employments in a stand-by capacity. Readiness to serve may be hired, quite as much as service itself, and time spent lying in wait for threats to the safety of the employer's property may be treated by the parties as a benefit to the employer.? (Armour & Co. v. Wantock, 323 U.S. 126 (1944); Skidmore v. Swift, 323 U.S. 134 (1944)) The workweek ordinarily includes ?all the time during which an employee is necessarily required to be on the employer's premises, on duty or at a prescribed work place?. (Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680 (1946)) The Portal-to-Portal Act did not change the rule except to provide an exception for preliminary and postliminary activities. See ? 785.34.
This document cites
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2013, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
sneider, dora | Lacourse Roland Arthur | Spiller, Rudolph M. | former town manager returns to job in machias | Causa nº 1692/2010. Resolución nº 168838, de Corte de Apelaciones de Santiago, de September 30, 2010 | Sentencia nº 2939 de Consiglio di Stato, June 10, 2009 | Dictamen nº 42864 de Contraloría General de la República de June 24 1976 | Decreto 860 - Sin Titulo